Steel Products
SMU Survey and Index-Based Contracts
Written by John Packard
January 25, 2013
The issue of excessive discounting against CRU and other index-based issues raised by ArcelorMittal in their price increase announcement are ones which Steel Market Update has been researching and which we began raising in our last steel market survey. During conversations with service centers, steel mills and end users we were catching frustrations with the contract negotiation process and we have been curious to know how deep these concerns might run. SMU is not ready to run a major article on the subject as it is a fairly complicated one, but we will provide the results from last week’s survey where we asked a couple of questions on the subject.
We asked the service centers how many purchase steel based on the CRU or other index-based formula from the domestic steel mills. We found 61 percent of the service centers do purchase at least some portion of their steel on an indexed basis.
SMU asked the distributors how many of them were increasing the number of index-based contracts they have with domestic steel mills and 21 percent responded they were expanding the number of contracts.
We then asked the service centers if they were seeing any resistance from either the mills or their customers to future index-based contract purchases and we found: 58 percent reported no resistance, 27 percent reported their customers were resisting, 9 percent reported the mills were resisting and 6 percent reported both the mills and customers were resisting.
Our mill respondents were also asked a question regarding index-based contracts and their company’s desire to increase, maintain or reduce their expose to these contracts. Of those responding to our survey – and I must warn you the response rate is not large when compared to our other groups – 14 percent reported their company wished to increase their exposure, 57 percent maintain and 29 percent reduce their exposure.
We did not collect any comments which shed any meaningful light on the results and this subject needs further research and review to determine if there is a trend developing regarding index-based contracts, as both buyers and mills struggle with spot inconsistencies from mill to mill and market to market.
John Packard
Read more from John PackardLatest in Steel Products
Market says cutting interest rates will spur stalled domestic plate demand
Market sources say demand for domestic plate refuses to budge despite stagnating prices.
U.S. Steel to halt slab conversion at Granite City Works
U.S. Steel said it plans to reduce slab consumption at its Granite City Works near St. Louis, a company spokesperson said on Monday. The Pittsburgh-based steelmaker will shift the production and processing of steel slabs to its Mon Valley Works near Pittsburgh and its Gary Works near Chicago. Citing a United Steelworkers (USW) union memo, […]
SMU Week in Review: September 1-5
Here are highlights of what’s happened this past week and a few upcoming things to keep an eye on.
HR Futures: Market finds footing on supply-side mechanics
As Labor Day marks the transition into fall, the steel market enters September with a similar sense of change. Supply-side fundamentals are beginning to show signs of restraint: imports are limited, outages loom, and production is capped, setting the stage for a market that feels steady on the surface but still unsettled underneath.
Beige Book: US markets remain cautious amidst volatile pricing environment
Sluggish economic activity across the US was largely attributed to uncertainty caused by tariff policies and growing cost pressures, according to the US Federal Reserve’s (The Fed) latest Beige Book report. The Fed’s latest economic report, posted on Sept. 3, consists of economic findings from the six weeks preceding Aug. 25 throughout 12 districts. Economic […]