SMU Data and Models

Foreign vs. Domestic Price Spread
Written by John Packard
September 22, 2013
A majority of the manufacturing companies (57 percent) responding to our most recent steel market survey told us that the spread between foreign and domestic steel is wide enough to justify buying foreign steel. The percentage of manufacturing companies answering this way has increased by 3 percent compared to our results from 30 days ago. Service centers were a little less enthusiastic about foreign with 42 percent reporting foreign prices as being competitive with domestic prices to the point where their company could justify buying foreign steel. However, when compared to our results from 30 days ago the percentage of service centers responding this way has doubled (21 percent).
Separate from the manufacturing and service center responses were those of the trading companies which responded to our questionnaire. The trading companies were unanimous, with 100 percent of those responding reporting foreign prices at levels where business could be conducted. Even so, only 28 percent of the trading company respondents reported seeing an increase in the number of requests for foreign pricing.
The percentage of our manufacturing and service center respondents reporting that their company was actually in the process of buying foreign steel dropped down from those reporting the spread as being wide enough to justify making a purchase. Of the manufacturing companies 38 percent reported that they were buying foreign steel at this time, which is actually lower than the 43 percent from our survey results conducted in mid-August. Of the service center respondents 35 percent reported their company as placing foreign orders at this time up from 24 percent 30 days ago.
We had a couple of comments left behind during the survey process. One was from a large manufacturing group which reported, “The latest round of offers from foreign mills is significantly lower than the current domestic spot prices.” They then went on to explain why they were not taking advantage of the lower foreign prices at this time, “The only reason we are not taking advantage of foreign offers is our current reduction of inventory levels.”
A second manufacturing company told us during the survey process, “Very little foreign HRC being offered.”

John Packard
Read more from John PackardLatest in SMU Data and Models

Apparent steel supply remains elevated in July
Apparent supply totaled 8.88 million short tons (st) in July, down 38,000 st from June and 6% higher than the same month last year

HRC vs. prime scrap spread narrows slightly
The price spread between prime scrap and hot-rolled coil (HRC) narrowed by a hair this month, according to SMU’s most recent pricing data.

SMU Scrap Survey: Current Sentiment rises as Future Sentiment falls
SMU’s current Scrap sentiment index increased this month while future sentiment declined, according to our latest ferrous scrap survey data.

SMU scrap market survey results now available
SMU’s September ferrous scrap market survey results are now available on our website to all premium members.

SMU Survey: Sentiment inches up from low levels
SMU’s Steel Buyers’ Sentiment Indices ticked higher this week, according to the latest data from our flat-rolled steel survey.