SMU Data and Models
Foreign vs. Domestic Price Spread
Written by John Packard
September 22, 2013
A majority of the manufacturing companies (57 percent) responding to our most recent steel market survey told us that the spread between foreign and domestic steel is wide enough to justify buying foreign steel. The percentage of manufacturing companies answering this way has increased by 3 percent compared to our results from 30 days ago. Service centers were a little less enthusiastic about foreign with 42 percent reporting foreign prices as being competitive with domestic prices to the point where their company could justify buying foreign steel. However, when compared to our results from 30 days ago the percentage of service centers responding this way has doubled (21 percent).
Separate from the manufacturing and service center responses were those of the trading companies which responded to our questionnaire. The trading companies were unanimous, with 100 percent of those responding reporting foreign prices at levels where business could be conducted. Even so, only 28 percent of the trading company respondents reported seeing an increase in the number of requests for foreign pricing.
The percentage of our manufacturing and service center respondents reporting that their company was actually in the process of buying foreign steel dropped down from those reporting the spread as being wide enough to justify making a purchase. Of the manufacturing companies 38 percent reported that they were buying foreign steel at this time, which is actually lower than the 43 percent from our survey results conducted in mid-August. Of the service center respondents 35 percent reported their company as placing foreign orders at this time up from 24 percent 30 days ago.
We had a couple of comments left behind during the survey process. One was from a large manufacturing group which reported, “The latest round of offers from foreign mills is significantly lower than the current domestic spot prices.” They then went on to explain why they were not taking advantage of the lower foreign prices at this time, “The only reason we are not taking advantage of foreign offers is our current reduction of inventory levels.”
A second manufacturing company told us during the survey process, “Very little foreign HRC being offered.”
John Packard
Read more from John PackardLatest in SMU Data and Models
SMU Survey: Sheet lead times ease further, plate hits one-year high
Steel buyers responding to this week’s SMU market survey report a continued softening in sheet lead times. Meanwhile, plate lead times have moderately extended and are at a one-year high.
SMU Survey: Buyers report more price flexibility from mills
Nearly half of the steel buyers responding to this week’s SMU market survey say domestic mills are showing increased willingness to negotiate pricing on new spot orders. This marks a significant shift from the firmer stance mills held in prior weeks.
SMU Survey: Buyers’ Sentiment Indices fall
Current Sentiment Index dropped six points to +42 this week compared to two weeks earlier. It has fallen in every successive survey since reaching a 2025 high of +66 on Feb. 19.
March service center shipments and inventories report
Steel service center shipments and inventories report through March 2024.
Apparent steel supply contracts in February
The amount of finished steel that entered the US market in February receded from January’s peak, according to our analysis of Department of Commerce and American Iron and Steel Institute (AISI) data.