Market Segment
US Steel Seeks Permanent Separation from US Steel Canada
Written by Sandy Williams
October 8, 2015
The Ontario Superior Court has reserved judgment on a plan by US Steel Corporation for the company and US Steel Canada to “go their separate ways.” Justice Herman J. Wilton Siegal said it is one of the toughest decisions he has had to make from the bench and will issue a summary of his decision on Friday with more details next week.
In Wednesday’s court hearing, US Steel said it would maintain all services and arrangements for its Canadian unit for up to 24 months as part of a transition agreement. It will not make a bid for the Canadian assets.
US Steel Canada says that to continue operations it must be free of pension obligations and municipal taxes.
According to the Globe and Mail, US Steel said it will provide funds for pension contributions for the rest of 2015 but will retain the automotive contracts. US Steel agreed to inform automakers that they have the option to continue to buy their steel from Lake Erie Works.
United Steelworkers 1005 President Gary Howe said, “I think a lot of people would be happy about the company becoming Canadian again.”
Local 8782 President Bill Ferguson said, “I think it could make a go. The big problem now is steel orders being moved to the U.S. We could better keep the orders here with an independent company.”
Gord Capern, an attorney for the USW, said the “The reason we are here is because of a crisis that U.S. Steel created.”
The mayor of Hamilton, Fred Eisenberger, weighed in on the ramifications to the region if US Steel Canada is given relief on its $6 million annual tax payments and its payment of pension benefits.
“The loss of $6M a year (equivalent to a 1% tax increase) compounded year after year would have a tremendously negative impact on the City’s finances,” said Eisenberger in an open letter regarding US Steel.
He added, “There are approximately 7000 US Steel Canada pensioners living in Hamilton who are already feeling the stress and anxiety of the bankruptcy proceedings which could cut and/or eliminate their pensions and health benefits. The ripple effect of pension and benefit reductions, coupled with higher property taxes is a serious concern that cannot be ignored.
US Steel Canada Background
US Steel Canada was originally founded in 1910 as the Steel Company of Canada which was shortened to Stelco and then officially adopted as its name in 1980. The company was plagued with strikes following World War II and later by lockouts under U.S. Steel.
In the 1980s recession the company suffered job losses and plummeting share prices that continued into the 1990s. The company entered bankruptcy protection in 2004 with a $1.3 billion pension shortfall. In 2006 a shaky Stelco emerged from bankruptcy with a $150 million pension infusion from Ontario.
Stelco was bought by US Steel Corporation in October 2007 for $1.8 billion and $800 million in assumed debt. The company was renamed US Steel Canada although the Stelco name persisted.
At the end of 2008 US Steel laid off 700 employees at Hamilton works and shut down the blast furnace. In March 2009, Hamilton Works was temporarily idled along with most of Lake Erie Works with more than 2000 employees laid off. Market conditions and weak customer demand resulted in another temporarily shutdown of Hamilton in Oct. 2010. In Dec. 2013 Hamilton’s steel making and iron making operations were permanently closed.
US Steel Canada entered CCAA bankruptcy protection in September 2014.
Sandy Williams
Read more from Sandy WilliamsLatest in Market Segment
Nucor targets ‘white hot’ data center boom
With infrastructure demand shifting toward digital capacity, Nucor Corp. is positioning itself as the go-to steel supplier for the data center boom.
Gerdau’s N. American earnings rise in Q3 due to fall in imports
Gerdau’s North American profits rose in the third quarter, boosted by a decline in imports due to Section 232 steel tariffs.
Ternium swings to Q3 loss, eyes 2026 recovery
Ternium closed the third quarter with steady shipments and improving margins. But trade policy uncertainty and subdued demand in Mexico weighed on the Latin American steelmaker’s results.
SMU Mill Order Index fell in September
SMU’s Mill Order Index declined in September after repeated gains from June through August. The shift came as service center shipping rates and inventories fell.
Algoma’s losses widen in Q3 as tariff troubles continue
Algoma Steel’s net loss more than quadrupled in the third quarter on trade woes and its EAF transition. Separately, the company announced a change in leadership, as CEO Michael Garcia will retire at the end of the year.