Steel Mills
Intellectual Property Dispute Ruled in Favor of US Steel Canada
Written by Sandy Williams
June 14, 2016
An attempt by US Steel to prevent US Steel Canada from continuing to use processes the parent company developed for high strength steels, has been thwarted by the Ontario Superior Court.
US Steel claims it owns the intellectual property used by USSC, including the processes used to produce various grades of advanced high strength steel. A Transition Arrangement between USSC and US Steel Corp. was established in October 2015 in which the parties agreed to resolve issues on property rights by December 31, 2015.
The agreement said: “Until closing of a transaction to sell all or substantially all assets of USSC, USSC is permitted to continue to use all intellectual property currently used by or available to it and owned or licensed by USS, if any, necessary to operate its business in the ordinary course, including retaining the right to use the name and brand ‘Stelco.’”
In May 2016, US Steel wrote to USSC counsel claiming again ownership of the intellectual property used by USSC and contested USSC’s entitlement to convey the rights to it in a sale of the company.
US Steel Canada filed a motion with the Ontario Superior Court on May 30 asking for the court to establish a claims process to identify and determine the intellectual property rights claimed by former parent corporation US Steel.
In an email last week a spokesperson for US Steel Canada commented on the motion, “It is worthy of note that it is USSC that has brought this matter before the Court to seek clarity on the issue. To date, no mutually acceptable resolution has been reached during good faith discussions as USS has not provided sufficient information regarding the nature of their claims, the specific trade secrets in question, nor the basis for their allegations.”
US Steel requested the motion be denied, claiming that the process would require a “significant amount of time and effort on behalf of USS.”
“Such an exercise is both unreasonable and unnecessary as it does not make sense to waste time and expense identifying potential intellectual property claims which may not be contested by USSC and may
have no bearing on the SISP,” wrote counsel for US Steel.
US Steel Canada prevailed with Justice Wilton Siegel defining the IP claims process. US Steel was ordered to provide to USSC by June 17 a description of all the intellectual property it is claiming. USSC is to review the information with the court-appointed monitor and any continuing disputes will be settled in court in July.
Sandy Williams
Read more from Sandy WilliamsLatest in Steel Mills
Steel Summit: Burritt says USS and Nippon are fast-tracking modern steelmaking
U.S. Steel President and CEO David Burritt told audiences at SMU's Steel Summit 2025 that the iconic American steelmaker’s partnership with Nippon Steel is fast-tracking smarter steel production.
Nucor moves to stop HRC price slide with $10/ton hike
Nucor is attempting to halt the decline in hot-rolled coil prices with the announcement of a $10-per-short-ton increase in its weekly consumer spot price on Monday.
Explosion rocks ArcelorMittal’s DR plant in Mexico
ArcelorMittal reported a "strong" explosion at the direct reduction part of its massive Lazaro Cardenas mill in Mexico.
SDI to acquire remaining stake in New Process Steel
Steel Dynamics Inc. (SDI) announced that it has agreed to acquire the remaining 55% equity interest in New Process Steel.
North Star results improve despite buyer caution as tariffs drive prices higher
North Star BlueScope said it is optimistic that US tariffs will bolster selling prices and tighten the spread the Australia-based steel maker suffered in 2025.