SMU Data and Models
Lead Times Slip on Cold Rolled and Coated Steels
Written by John Packard
August 18, 2016
In our last issue of Steel Market Update we wrote about lead times shrinking as being one of the reasons why we adjusted our Price Momentum Indicator. We cited published lead times by NLMK USA and Nucor Berkeley as examples of the changes we were seeing and discussing with steel buyers. This week we conducted our flat rolled steel market trends analysis and as part of that process we asked for information about lead times. Based on the average of all of the data points received we found hot rolled lead times remained the same as what we saw at the beginning of the month while cold rolled, galvanized and Galvalume lead times were shorter.
Hot rolled lead times are averaging just under 4.0 weeks (3.73 weeks) according to our survey participants. This is in line with the 3.80 weeks reported at the beginning of August. This is also about a half a week longer than what we saw at this point in time last year when our survey found the average HRC lead time to be 3.38 weeks.
Cold rolled lead times are now averaging 6 weeks (5.97 weeks) down from about 6.75 weeks reported in each of the last three survey periods going back to the beginning of July. Lead times on CRC were 5.48 weeks at this same point in time one year ago.
Galvanized lead times now average 5.45 weeks which is about one half a week less than the 7.08 weeks reported at the beginning of August. During the month of July GI lead times were closer to 7.5 weeks. One year ago GI lead times were essentially the same as what we are reporting for this week (5.48 weeks in 2015 vs. 5.45 weeks now).
Galvalume lead times also shrunk slightly and are now averaging 6.85 weeks, down from 7.25 weeks at the beginning of the month. One year ago AZ lead times averaged 6.50 weeks.
A side note: The data for both lead times and negotiations comes from only service center and manufacturer respondents. We do not include commentary from the steel mills, trading companies, or toll processors in this particular group of questions.
To see an interactive history of our Steel Mill Negotiations data, visit our website here.
John Packard
Read more from John PackardLatest in SMU Data and Models
SMU’s April at a glance
SMU’s Monthly Review provides a summary of our key steel market metrics for the previous month, with the latest data updated through April 30.
SMU Survey: Steel Buyers’ Sentiment Indices recover
SMU’s Buyers’ Sentiment Indices both improved this week, reversing the decline seen two weeks ago.
SMU Survey: Sheet and plate lead times flatten out
Sheet and plate lead times held steady this week, according to buyers responding to the latest SMU market survey. This week we saw little change from mid-April levels, with just one product (Galvalume) showing any significant movement.
SMU Survey: More mills willing to deal on sheet prices, less so on plate
Nearly two thirds of the steel buyers who responded to this week’s SMU survey say domestic mills are negotiable on spot prices. This increasing flexibility marks a significant shift from the firmer stance mills held in recent months.
SMU Survey: Sheet lead times ease further, plate hits one-year high
Steel buyers responding to this week’s SMU market survey report a continued softening in sheet lead times. Meanwhile, plate lead times have moderately extended and are at a one-year high.