SMU Data and Models

Steel Mill Lead Times Essentially Same as One Year Ago
Written by John Packard
September 25, 2016
Flat rolled lead times continued to slip, according to those responding to last week’s Steel Market Update flat rolled market trends analysis survey. Lead times are very close to where they were at this time last year when benchmark hot rolled was being reported at $660 per ton (September 16, 2015) and then proceeded to drop to $360 per ton by the first week of December 2015.
Hot rolled lead times are averaging just slightly more than 3 weeks, down from just over 4 weeks at the beginning of July. One year ago HRC lead times averaged 3.04 weeks
Cold rolled lead times are averaging just shy 5.5 weeks (5.38) which is down from 6.79 weeks at the beginning of July and a little lower than the 5.65 weeks reported one year ago.
Galvanized lead times are now essentially exactly what we saw one year ago. Last week’s respondents pegged GI lead times as averaging 5.84 weeks one year ago the average was 5.83 weeks. At the beginning of July GI lead times were 7.50 weeks.
Galvalume, a more seasonal product than the other three, is averaging slightly less than 6.5 weeks (6.33 weeks), down from the 7.29 weeks reported at the beginning of July. One year ago AZ lead times were reported through our survey as being 6.50 weeks.
The shorter the lead times, the more pressure on the domestic mills to fill their order books. At the same time, the shorter the lead times, the less pressure there is on steel buyers to increase orders. We tend to see the domestic steel mills more willing to negotiate flat rolled steel prices as lead times shrink. We will address that issue in our next article in tonight’s newsletter.
A side note: The data for both lead times and negotiations comes from only service center and manufacturer respondents to SMU proprietary flat rolled steel market trends survey which we conduct twice per week. We do not include commentary from the steel mills, trading companies, or toll processors in this particular group of questions. The graphic above does not depict the lead times that may be quoted by any single mill. The data is an average of our respondents only (approximately 100 manufacturing and steel distributors/wholesalers).
To see an interactive history of our Steel Mill Negotiations data, visit our website here.

John Packard
Read more from John PackardLatest in SMU Data and Models

SMU’s April at a glance
SMU’s Monthly Review provides a summary of our key steel market metrics for the previous month, with the latest data updated through April 30.

SMU Survey: Steel Buyers’ Sentiment Indices recover
SMU’s Buyers’ Sentiment Indices both improved this week, reversing the decline seen two weeks ago.

SMU Survey: Sheet and plate lead times flatten out
Sheet and plate lead times held steady this week, according to buyers responding to the latest SMU market survey. This week we saw little change from mid-April levels, with just one product (Galvalume) showing any significant movement.

SMU Survey: More mills willing to deal on sheet prices, less so on plate
Nearly two thirds of the steel buyers who responded to this week’s SMU survey say domestic mills are negotiable on spot prices. This increasing flexibility marks a significant shift from the firmer stance mills held in recent months.

SMU Survey: Sheet lead times ease further, plate hits one-year high
Steel buyers responding to this week’s SMU market survey report a continued softening in sheet lead times. Meanwhile, plate lead times have moderately extended and are at a one-year high.