SMU Data and Models
Steel Mill Lead Times Extend YOY
Written by John Packard
December 8, 2016
Over the past four days Steel Market Update has been conducting one of our market trends surveys. The respondents to our queries have provided data indicating slightly longer lead times on hot rolled, cold rolled and Galvalume while galvanized lead times remained steady at mid-November levels.
The lead times reported in this article are the average of the responses collected from all of our steel survey respondents for each flat rolled product. The averages do not reflect the lead time at any one supplier. As an average you can expect to find steel mill lead times at domestic steel producers that may be longer or shorter than what we are reporting below.
The purpose of our survey is to identify any changes in the trend. In this case are lead times moving in one direction or another?
Average hot rolled lead times are closing in on four and a half weeks (4.31 weeks) which is an improvement over the 4.18 weeks we reported in mid-November and much higher than the 2.84 weeks we saw not that long ago in the middle of October 2016. One year ago HRC lead times averaged 3.05 weeks.
Cold rolled lead times, which averaged less than five weeks (4.78 weeks) one year ago are now averaging six and a half weeks (6.58 weeks) up from 6.35 weeks in mid-November and much improved over the five (5.0) weeks reported in the middle of October 2016.
Galvanized lead times were unchanged at 6.84 weeks. This is one week further extended than what we were reporting in the middle of October. One year ago GI lead times were closer to five weeks (5.20).
Galvalume lead times moved out and are closing in on eight weeks (7.85 weeks). This is slightly longer than the 7.36 weeks reported at the middle of November and is about 1.25 weeks longer than what we saw in the middle of October 2016. One year ago AZ lead times averaged 6.13 weeks.
The longer the lead times the more support given to price increases and the pricing power of the domestic steel mills.
A side note: The data for both lead times and negotiations comes from only service center and manufacturer respondents. We do not include commentary from the steel mills, trading companies, or toll processors in this particular group of questions.
To see an interactive history of our Steel Mill Negotiations data, visit our website here.
John Packard
Read more from John PackardLatest in SMU Data and Models
SMU’s April at a glance
SMU’s Monthly Review provides a summary of our key steel market metrics for the previous month, with the latest data updated through April 30.
SMU Survey: Steel Buyers’ Sentiment Indices recover
SMU’s Buyers’ Sentiment Indices both improved this week, reversing the decline seen two weeks ago.
SMU Survey: Sheet and plate lead times flatten out
Sheet and plate lead times held steady this week, according to buyers responding to the latest SMU market survey. This week we saw little change from mid-April levels, with just one product (Galvalume) showing any significant movement.
SMU Survey: More mills willing to deal on sheet prices, less so on plate
Nearly two thirds of the steel buyers who responded to this week’s SMU survey say domestic mills are negotiable on spot prices. This increasing flexibility marks a significant shift from the firmer stance mills held in recent months.
SMU Survey: Sheet lead times ease further, plate hits one-year high
Steel buyers responding to this week’s SMU market survey report a continued softening in sheet lead times. Meanwhile, plate lead times have moderately extended and are at a one-year high.