Trade Cases

President Orders Action on Trade Enforcement and Trade Deficit
Written by Sandy Williams
April 2, 2017
On Friday the President signed an executive order that is designed to enhance trade enforcement efforts by the Commerce Department.
The Secretary of Homeland Security, in consultation with the Secretary of the Treasury, the Secretary of Commerce, and the United States Trade Representative Commerce are directed to develop a plan within 90 days that will require importers that pose a risk to U.S. revenue to “provide security for antidumping and countervailing duty liability through bonds and other legal measures.” Homeland Security is also tasked with identifying other appropriate enforcement measures.
Homeland Security and Customs Border Protection are to develop within 90 days a strategy to combat violations of US trade law that enable “interdiction and disposal” of inadmissible imported merchandise, protect intellectual property rights, and give federal prosecutors high priority to prosecute trade law violations.
The president also signed an executive order directing that Commerce and USTR provide an Omnibus Report on Significant Trade Deficits within 90 days that will assess, among other issues, the causes of trade deficit and its impact on U.S. manufacturing, jobs, and national security. The trade deficit in 2016 totaled $502.3 billion, according to the Commerce Department.
This order, said Commerce Secretary Wilbur Ross, will “identify every form of trade abuse and every non-reciprocal practice that now contributes to the U.S. trade deficit.”
“It will demonstrate the administration’s intention not to hip-shoot, not to do anything casual, not to do anything abruptly, but to take a very measured and analytical approach, both to analyzing the problem and therefore to developing the solutions for it,” he added.
The AD/CVD order can be accessed here and the Trade Deficit order here.
Industry comments
American Iron and Steel Institute president and CEO Thomas J. Gibson commented:
“AISI has consistently urged that the United States take aggressive action to address trade barriers that distort global trade and international competition and harm U.S. industries, including the U.S. steel industry. The executive orders today provide key guidance on that path, especially with regard to increased enforcement and an enhanced look at AD/CVD duty collection at our borders. We are pleased that the president and his team remain committed to leveling the playing field for American manufacturing, and we look forward to continuing the steel industry’s strong role in working with Administration to combat these unfair practices and ensure a fair and competitive global trade arena.”
US Steel Corporation released the following statement:
“U. S. Steel welcomes the steps taken today by President Trump aimed at further identifying and addressing root causes of unfair trade. Tougher enforcement of duty collection will contribute towards the fair and level playing field that America’s steel industry has long called for. A strong domestic steel industry is at the foundation of America’s economic and national security. We look forward to working with the Administration on these matters.”
United Steelworkers International president Leo W. Gerard said the executive orders must be “followed by serious, continued and comprehensive action.”
“Today’s announcement will hopefully help to strengthen American industry by cracking down on foreign trade law cheaters stealing American jobs and opportunity,” said Gerard. “As a diverse manufacturing union, the USW is the largest, single entity that has consistently fought for effective trade law enforcement to try to save our members’ jobs. But, getting a favorable decision from our government is only the start of the difficult and complex task of enforcement.”
He added, “Laws were tightened in a bipartisan effort in the last Congress, and those changes have made a real difference. Expanded authorities and efforts are critical because, without them, other countries will keep flooding our market with their unfairly traded products. Enforcing our trade laws must be a national security priority as predatory trade actions have undermined our industrial base.”

Sandy Williams
Read more from Sandy WilliamsLatest in Trade Cases

Price on Trade: IEEPA tariffs head to the Supreme Court, DOJ ramps up trade enforcement
International trade law and policy remain a hot topic in Washington and beyond this week. We are paying special attention to the ongoing litigation of the president’s tariff policies and the administration’s efforts to heighten trade enforcement.

Mexico considers stiff tariffs for steel, autos, and other imports
Mexico is considering imposing steep tariffs on imports of steel, automobiles, and over 1,400 other products. Its target? Countries with which it does not have free trade agreements, mainly China, India, Thailand, and other South Asian nations.

Leibowitz: With ‘reciprocal’ tariffs struck down again in court, what happens next?
President Trump’s “reciprocal” tariffs under the International Emergency Economic Policy Act (IEEPA) were struck down again, this time on Aug. 29 by the Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit (CAFC). The legal and policy mess continues, with the next stop being the US Supreme Court.

Market unfazed by US circuit court’s IEEPA decision
Repealing any reciprocal tariffs placed by President Donald Trump on US imports of direct reduced iron (DRI), iron ore, hot-briquetted iron (HBI), and pig iron would have only a nominal impact on the US steel market, market participants said.

ITC votes to keep HR duties after sunset review
The US government determined this week that hot-rolled steel imports from a handful of countries continue to threaten the domestic steel industry.