SMU Data and Models
Lead Times Stretch – Some Products More than Others
Written by John Packard
November 2, 2017
After price increase announcements, it is important to follow steel mill lead times (and other keys) as a way of seeing if the increases are being seriously considered by steel buyers. The farther and faster lead times move out, the more support for the price increases announced by the domestic steel mills.
Steel Market Update (SMU) conducted an analysis of the flat rolled steel markets and market trends over the course of the past four days. One of the key indicators produced out of our analysis is the change in lead time trends in hot rolled, cold rolled, galvanized and Galvalume steels. Respondents to this week’s questionnaire noted that lead times on each product were higher than what was reported during the middle of October.
Hot rolled lead times jumped a full week as a combination of maintenance and reaction to higher steel prices drove buyers to place more HRC orders. Our last analysis, which was produced the week of Oct. 16, reported HRC lead times as averaging a little more than 3 weeks (3.16 weeks). This week, that average has grown to 4.22 weeks. One year ago, HRC lead times averaged slightly less than 4 weeks (3.86 weeks) and steel prices at that point in time were on the rise.
Cold rolled lead times also moved out about one-half of a week from mid-October to this week. In mid-October, lead times averaged 5.77 weeks, and this week our respondents reported CRC lead times as being slightly longer than six weeks (6.14 weeks). Last year, CRC lead times averaged six weeks.
Galvanized lead times only moved out by one-quarter of a week compared to mid-October. In mid-October, GI lead times averaged six weeks. This week, we calculated the average as 6.26 weeks. Last year, GI lead times averaged 6.36 weeks.
Galvalume lead times moved out by approximately three-quarters of a week compared to mid-October. Our respondents pegged AZ lead times as averaging 6.80 weeks. One year ago, AZ lead times were about the same, averaging 6.88 weeks.
Note: These lead times are based on the average from manufacturers and steel service centers who participated in this week’s SMU market trends analysis. Our lead times do not predict what any individual may get from any specific mill supplier. Look to your mill rep for actual lead times. Our lead times are meant only to identify trends and changes in the marketplace. To see an interactive history of our Steel Mill Lead Times data, visit our website here.
John Packard
Read more from John PackardLatest in SMU Data and Models
SMU Scrap Survey: Current, Future Sentiment Indices log declines
However, in a month plagued by tariff and economic uncertainty, both current and near-term outlooks for our scrap survey respondents remained surprisingly optimistic.
SMU’s April at a glance
SMU’s Monthly Review provides a summary of our key steel market metrics for the previous month, with the latest data updated through April 30.
SMU Survey: Steel Buyers’ Sentiment Indices see modest recovery
SMU’s Buyers’ Sentiment Indices both improved this week, reversing the decline seen two weeks ago.
SMU Survey: Sheet and plate lead times flatten out
Sheet and plate lead times held steady this week, according to buyers responding to the latest SMU market survey. This week we saw little change from mid-April levels, with just one product (Galvalume) showing any significant movement.
SMU Survey: More mills willing to deal on sheet prices, less so on plate
Nearly two thirds of the steel buyers who responded to this week’s SMU survey say domestic mills are negotiable on spot prices. This increasing flexibility marks a significant shift from the firmer stance mills held in recent months.