SMU Data and Models
SMU Market Trends: Is Infrastructure Next?
Written by Tim Triplett
December 21, 2017
In addition to the tax overhaul passed by the Republicans this week, President Trump has promised a trillion-dollar infrastructure overhaul. Given the possible $1.5 trillion cost of the tax cuts, will the public have the stomach for another big bill to fix the nation’s aging roads and bridges?
Respondents to Steel Market Update’s market trends questionnaire this week were evenly split on whether to expect an infrastructure package out of Washington that will boost steel demand next year. Their comments fall into four groups: those who are hopeful for at least some additional infrastructure spending, those who believe there is no way Congress will tackle another big spending package, those who point out there will be no effect on steel demand next year even if an infrastructure bill is passed, and those who see politics preventing anything positive. Following is a sampling of comments from steel buyers.
From the hopeful:
- “Not sure how big, but they will pass something on infrastructure.”
- “They will try, but it will likely be trimmed down.”
From the doubtful:
- “After the tax bill is signed, how will the federal government finance a big infrastructure bill? Increase the deficit even more? Not going to happen.”
- “Infrastructure is the one legislation that both parties can agree on, although they would argue over the total amount and how to fund it [given the tax bill’s passage].”
From the pragmatic:
- “Even if passed quickly, it will be 18 months to two years before it will effectively change demand. Will it cause a blip in pricing? Sure, but no effect on demand for a while.”
- “Even if they do pass a bill, it will take time before steel demand is impacted in a positive way. 2019 would see the new demand from a bill if passed in 2018.”
From the disillusioned:
- “I do not expect this administration to get much accomplished.”
- “Tough to get any Democrats to support any initiative by the Trump administration.”
- “I have no faith in Washington to move any cohesive agenda forward.”
Tim Triplett
Read more from Tim TriplettLatest in SMU Data and Models
SMU’s April at a glance
SMU’s Monthly Review provides a summary of our key steel market metrics for the previous month, with the latest data updated through April 30.
SMU Survey: Steel Buyers’ Sentiment Indices recover
SMU’s Buyers’ Sentiment Indices both improved this week, reversing the decline seen two weeks ago.
SMU Survey: Sheet and plate lead times flatten out
Sheet and plate lead times held steady this week, according to buyers responding to the latest SMU market survey. This week we saw little change from mid-April levels, with just one product (Galvalume) showing any significant movement.
SMU Survey: More mills willing to deal on sheet prices, less so on plate
Nearly two thirds of the steel buyers who responded to this week’s SMU survey say domestic mills are negotiable on spot prices. This increasing flexibility marks a significant shift from the firmer stance mills held in recent months.
SMU Survey: Sheet lead times ease further, plate hits one-year high
Steel buyers responding to this week’s SMU market survey report a continued softening in sheet lead times. Meanwhile, plate lead times have moderately extended and are at a one-year high.