SMU Data and Models

Steel Mill Negotiations: Some Tightening?
Written by Tim Triplett
January 18, 2018
The mills are clearly trying to collect the price increases they announced on flat roll in December and January, but they appear to be experiencing only some success. About 40 percent of steel buyers responding to the latest Steel Market Update market trends questionnaire say they have found their mill suppliers unwilling to negotiate on price. That compares to 25 percent reporting mills holding the line earlier in the month. So, talks have tightened up. On the flipside, however, that means that 60 percent of buyers are still finding some mills willing to talk price on certain products at least some of the time. When the majority view is that mills have some flexibility on price, what does that say about their ability to collect the latest increases?
Following are some buyers’ comments about mill negotiations:
• “Mills are very selective on negotiating.” Manufacturer/OEM
• “It depends on the products and quantity, etc. HRC is less negotiable, but coated more depending on the competitive situation.” Trading Company
• “It’s a mixed bag, but generally lead times are growing.” Service Center/Wholesaler
• “Yes, order books are firm, but they [mills] seem realistic that we aren’t at $35 just yet.” Service Center/Wholesaler
• “Mills in the South are unwilling to negotiate on spot tons.” Manufacturer/OEM
• “Order books are not firm, but there’s no negotiation.” Manufacturer/OEM
By market segment, 56 percent of SMU respondents say the mills continue to hold firm on hot rolled steel orders, while 44 percent report they’ve found mills willing to negotiate. That compares to 60 percent who reported the mills holding the line on prices in mid-December.
Half of cold roll buyers reported mills willing to dicker and half reported mills firm a month ago. This week, with little change, 54 percent said mills are open to price discussions, while 46 percent said prices are non-negotiable.
In the galvanized sector, it appears mills have loosened up a bit. About 63 percent of buyers say mills are negotiating on galvanized prices today, up from 51 percent of buyers in early January. Only 37 percent say mills are currently holding the line on coated products. In the Galvalume market, it’s a 50-50 proposition whether mills have any flexibility on price.
Note: SMU surveys active steel buyers twice each month to gauge the willingness of their steel suppliers to negotiate pricing. The results reflect current steel demand and changing spot pricing trends. SMU provides our members with a number of ways to interact with current and historical data. To see an interactive history of our Steel Mill Negotiations data, visit our website here.

Tim Triplett
Read more from Tim TriplettLatest in SMU Data and Models

SMU’s April at a glance
SMU’s Monthly Review provides a summary of our key steel market metrics for the previous month, with the latest data updated through April 30.

SMU Survey: Steel Buyers’ Sentiment Indices recover
SMU’s Buyers’ Sentiment Indices both improved this week, reversing the decline seen two weeks ago.

SMU Survey: Sheet and plate lead times flatten out
Sheet and plate lead times held steady this week, according to buyers responding to the latest SMU market survey. This week we saw little change from mid-April levels, with just one product (Galvalume) showing any significant movement.

SMU Survey: More mills willing to deal on sheet prices, less so on plate
Nearly two thirds of the steel buyers who responded to this week’s SMU survey say domestic mills are negotiable on spot prices. This increasing flexibility marks a significant shift from the firmer stance mills held in recent months.

SMU Survey: Sheet lead times ease further, plate hits one-year high
Steel buyers responding to this week’s SMU market survey report a continued softening in sheet lead times. Meanwhile, plate lead times have moderately extended and are at a one-year high.