Trade Cases
Mexico Ratifies USMCA, Canada Waits for U.S.
Written by Sandy Williams
June 20, 2019
Mexico voted to ratify the United States-Mexico-Canada Agreement on Wednesday, paving the path for Canada and the U.S, to follow suit. The vote by the Mexican senate was nearly unanimous at 114 to 4 with three senators abstaining. Although some senators expressed concern about capricious tariff threats from the U.S. president, the sentiment was generally that the agreement is good for the country and the North American economy.
“Mexico takes the lead, with clear signs that our economy is open,” Mexican Under Secretary for North America Jesús Seade said in a tweet following the vote. “We are confident that our partners will soon do the same for the sake of a strong North America, with clear rules, attractive for investment, stable and competitive.”
Canada has submitted the agreement to its parliament but is waiting for the U.S. to lead on ratification. Parliament will recess at the end of the week and will begin federal elections in October. The Prime Minister said he will reconvene parliament before the election to take a vote if the U.S. moves forward. The agreement is expected to pass easily in Canada.
“Our plan is to move forward in tandem with the U.S. We think of it as a kind of Goldilocks approach. Not too hot, not too cold. We’re not moving too fast, not moving too slow,” said Canadian Foreign Minister Chrystia Freeland last week.
Prime Minister Justin Trudeau will meet with President Trump this week to discuss the USMCA as well as the trade conflict with China.
U.S. lawmakers are still concerned about whether Mexico will follow through on enforcement of agreed labor reforms. The House Ways & Means trade subcommittee has scheduled a hearing on June 25 regarding the issue.
Congress is scheduled to leave for recess in August and U.S. Trade Representative Robert Lighthizer wants a vote before then.
“We want this dealt with as soon as possible,” said Lighthizer, adding that the agreement is “completely enforceable,” but pledged to work with Congress to address their concerns.
Senate Finance Committee Chairman Chuck Grassley said he “definitely” believes USMCA could be ratified before the August recess.
“If we don’t get it done by then, then of course I hope we can get it done in September or at least some time so it doesn’t get caught up in the 2020 election,” said Grassley.
House Speaker Nancy Pelosi told reporters on Wednesday that there are still several key impediments to congressional approval of the USMCA, citing enforcement rules, labor and environmental protections and provisions on pharmaceuticals. She has named a group of House Democrats to negotiate with the USTR on the issues.
The administration is waiting for a signal from Pelosi that there are enough votes to pass the USMCA before submitting the implementing bill to the House.
Sandy Williams
Read more from Sandy WilliamsLatest in Trade Cases
Canada, mirroring the US, plans to take harder line on imported steel and aluminum
The actions, which includes tariffs, are necessary to protect the Canadian market from global overcapacity. They are also needed because other countries have redirected material to Canada as a result of higher US tariffs, Carney said.
Industry cautiously optimistic despite lack of steel specifics in US-UK trade deal
Details of a new tariff-rate quota on US imports of British steel are lacking in the new US-UK trade deal.
Mexico shuts down steel importer amid trade talks
The Mexican government shut down two plants and warehouses operated by US-based LAU Industries.
US and Canada talk trade, market contemplates fate of S232 steel protections
Trade talks are progressing between the US and the market is contemplating the future of Section 232 tariffs.
Leibowitz: Tariffs are the trade version of going nuclear
In short, when tariffs go up, jobs in consuming industries go down. There is conclusive evidence from past actions: safeguard tariffs in 2002 and Section 232 tariffs in 2018. It is happening again in 2025. The Trump administration wants foreign producers (and US retailers) to absorb tariff increases (except in antidumping cases, where foreign absorption of tariffs is illegal).