Trade Cases
CSPA on Buy American: “Fifty Percent Was Already Chilling”
Written by Sandy Williams
July 18, 2019
“Discouraged” is how the Canadian Steel Producers Association described its reaction to President Trump’s executive order on sourcing of steel for federal projects in the United States. Increasing the use of American-sourced steel from 50 percent to 95 percent is “a step in the wrong direction,” said CSPA President Catherine Cobden in comments to ConstructConnect.
“It really is a step in the wrong direction between two countries that want to have fair and free trade,” said Cobden. “We are in the middle of seeking ratification of the new United States-Mexico-Canada Agreement (USMCA), as well. Canada and the U.S. share highly integrated steel markets, so it really makes no sense from our perspective to have this sort of requirement placed on us. It has had and will continue to have a negative effect on our industry.”
Cobden said it was important to note that the Buy American restrictions exclude everyone, not just Canadian steelmakers. The new rules will make firms bidding on projects “steer clear of steel from Canada” in order to comply with the new sourcing provisions.
“Fifty (percent) was already having a chilling effect on Canadian steel on those projects and now, moving to 95 percent, that will obviously continue on that trajectory,” said Cobden. “We’re in a better position than many others in the sense that we have North American benefits working with the U.S. and Mexico on our integrated steel markets.”
Cobden said the focus for North American steel industries should be on the problem of global steel overcapacity–steel that is cheap, heavily government subsidized and produced in areas with poor labor laws and lax environmental requirements. “In North America we do not have that…,” added Cobden. “Our view isn’t so much that the U.S. should back down, but that we should work together to combat this global overcapacity and look at ways to strengthen our position.”
Sandy Williams
Read more from Sandy WilliamsLatest in Trade Cases
Industry piles on new Section 232 steel derivative inclusion requests
The Department of Commerce received 97 submissions from producers, manufacturers, and groups seeking Section 232 tariff coverage for steel and aluminum derivative products.
Price on Trade: New EU steel tariffs don’t mean the US should weaken its stance
Any steel imports into the EU that exceed the new, lower quota level would be subject to a 50% tariff, which represents a major increase from the EU’s current 25% out-of-quota tariff. This move would largely align the EU’s steel tariff rate with Canada and the United States.
Global steel forum sets 2026 framework deadline as US ups pressure on excess capacity
Global steelmakers sounded the alarm Friday over the deepening excess steelmaking capacity crisis. Ministers at the Global Forum on Steel Excess Capacity (GFSEC) in Gqeberha, South Africa, pledged to...
CRU: China’s indirect steel exports find new destination markets
The boom in China’s direct steel exports has not stopped this year, even with a rise in protectionist measures globally. The increase is driven by...
U.S. Steel sues Algoma over iron pellet shipments
U.S. Steel is suing Algoma over the Canadian flat-rolled producer's rejection of iron pellet shipments, arguing it has breached its contract.