• Skip to main content

    Analysis

    HR Futures: Movement in the market

    Written by Daniel Doderer


    In the month since my last column, the tides have started to turn – and as usual it wasn’t the physical market that moved first.

    The curve began to firm quietly in late October, with the front end pushing higher and the second and third months finally breaking out of the tight $40–50 range that defined most of the summer. At the time, that strength looked more like positioning than fundamentals. But as October closed and November progressed, those gains turned out to be an early signal, with the physical market following shortly after.

    Back then, I wrote that there were no clear catalysts pointing to a strong move in either direction – and you could still make that case today (and I would). Still, Occam’s razor suggests the obvious drivers were always going to catch up. Imports remain barely a trickle, inventories are uncomfortably low (even though they’ve hovered at these levels for a while), and the market had been quietly coiling. When you zoom out, that buildup becomes much easier to see. The chart below combines physical and financial data to tell the story of the past few months.

    SMU mid-month price ranges and forward curves

    The shaded bars show SMU’s mid-month price ranges over the last three months. You can see that while futures barely budged from early September (dotted) through the end of October (dashed) – more on that in a moment – the low end of the physical range was steadily firming.

    Mills clearly felt their bargaining power improving as maintenance season kicked in, and the flurry of price announcements (along with steady week-to-week increases in Nucor’s CSP) might have been the spark the market needed. Once futures began to lift, the spot market was effectively locked in place. Both the floor and the ceiling shifted higher. Mills are now holding the line as lead times stretch into early 2026, and the calendar is in their favor.

    The issue, of course, is that supply-led rallies tend to have abbreviated lifespans. In some respects, tariff action this year has been a textbook example of how quickly supply-driven strength can appear and fade. The next chart offers another lens on the same idea by breaking the curve into three rolling buckets: 2–4 months up front (solid), 5–7 months in the middle (dashed), and 8–10 months in the back (dotted).

    As a reminder, contango is when the back of the curve sits above the front, usually a sign the market feels comfortable or even oversupplied. Backwardation is the opposite: near-term prices rise above later months because buyers are more worried about getting material today than six months from now. Charting the curve this way lets us see both the deepening of the recent contango but also the rise in overall price levels while still capturing these underlying market structures.

    What’s interesting is that aside from the two tariff-driven backwardation spikes earlier in the year, the curve has been in contango for nearly the entire year. That implies that even with low inventories and collapsing imports, domestic buyers were still comfortable enough not to chase tons early.

    That brings us to the most important question: Will demand finally come through? On that front, I can’t offer an answer. But one thing worth flagging is the risk that this rally becomes too much of a good thing is rising.

    Several people have noted that the spread between US HRC and Asian imports is now the widest it has been since mid-to-late summer. I’m not suggesting the import trend is about to flip, but that analysis also misses an important detail: when you look at the 3–4 month futures, you should tack on another ~$65, which would place the implied spread at its widest since the spring. That’s certainly something worth keeping on the radar.

    Disclaimer
    The content of this article is for informational purposes only. The views in this article do not represent financial services or advice. Any opinion expressed should not be treated as a specific inducement to make a particular investment or follow a particular strategy. Views and forecasts expressed are as of date indicated. They are subject to change without notice, may not come to be, and do not represent a recommendation or offer of any particular security, strategy or investment. Strategies mentioned may not be suitable for you. You must make an independent decision regarding investments or strategies mentioned in this article. It is recommended you consider your own particular circumstances and seek the advice from a financial professional before taking action in financial markets.

    Daniel Doderer

    Read more from Daniel Doderer

    Latest in Analysis

    Commerce lowers Mexico’s dumping rate in CORE case

    The US Department of Commerce has reduced the anti-dumping duty on corrosion-resistant steel (CORE) for some Mexican producers after a court order. On remand from the Court of International Trade (CIT), Commerce agreed that the record did not show that Galvasid SA de CV’s US customers separately negotiated or paid freight or insurance. The agency therefore removed the adjustment and recalculated the margin. As a result, the agency lowered Galvasid’s coated steel dumping rate to 14.54%, from 24.05%. The all-others rate is now 14.29%, down from 17.42%. Ternium’s rate is unchanged at 14.17%.

    Sheet and plate price gains accelerate as 2026 tons dry up

    Sheet and plate prices continue to push higher as mills charge a premium for what little spot tonnage remains for 2026, market participants said. SMU’s price assessment for hot-rolled (HR) coil now stands at $1,290 per short ton (st) on average, up $10/st week over week. HR price gains averaged $5/st w/w throughout July and August, with no changes in prices some weeks and gains of at most $15/st w/w. In September and October to date, in contrast, prices have increased every week—with the average gain at $11.25/st w/w and w/w gains as high as $20/st. Prices for cold-rolled and coated products continued to increase as well. SMU's price assessment for cold-rolled (CR) coil clocked in at...

    Cliffs shifts customers to index-linked, take-or-pay contracts

    Cleveland-Cliffs Inc. expects to earn more from the repricing of contract tonnage than it previously projected. The Cleveland-based steelmaker raised its estimate for the earnings benefit of the repricing to about $850 million from about $500 million. The company also said negotiations for 2027 contracts are progressing better than expected. More than half of the 2027 renewal process was complete as of Cliffs' third-quarter earnings call on Monday morning.

    Cleveland-Cliffs postpones Burns Harbor furnace reline to 2028

    Cleveland-Cliffs Inc. has rescheduled the planned reline of the C blast furnace at its Burns Harbor steel mill in northwest Indiana from mid-2027 to April 2028, company executives said. The delay allows the Cleveland-based steelmaker to keep the furnace, which has annual capacity of ~2.2 million short tons, operating while steel prices and demand remain favorable for mills, they said during the company’s third-quarter earnings call on Monday.

    Brazilian pig iron trade with US stuck in doldrums

    The pig iron trade from Brazil into the US has been lackluster over the last month with minimal activity. Many players in the trade thought activity would increase after the International Iron Metallics Assn (IIMA) meeting in Chicago earlier this month, but it has not materialized so far. Part of the reason could be the US scrap buy for October stretched out longer than usual, as buyers and sellers haggled over price. Now that prices settled upward, there may be different ideas on where pig iron prices should settle.