Economy
Keystone XL Pipeline: No Significant Impact on Climate Says US Report
Written by Sandy Williams
February 1, 2014
A State Department report on The Keystone XL Pipeline concludes that the project will have no significant impact on green house emissions that could affect the climate. The report opens the way for approval by President Obama to allow the pipeline construction to proceed. Approval is required because the proposed pipeline will cross the U.S. border.
“This is the fifth federal study on the environmental impact of the Keystone XL pipeline. Each previous one has stated that building Keystone XL would not adversely affect the environment. Today’s report confirms once again this result, including no appreciable impact on greenhouse gases,” Natural Resources Minister Joe Oliver said in a statement. “The benefits to the U.S. and Canada are clear. We await a timely decision on this project.”
According the State Department report, “Assuming construction of the proposed Project were to occur in the next few years, climate conditions during the construction period would not differ substantially from current conditions.” Climate changes during the operational time period “are anticipated to occur regardless of any potential effects from the proposed Project.”
“The President has clearly stated that the project will be in the national interest only if it does not significantly exacerbate the problem of carbon pollution,” said White House spokesman Matt Lehrich. “The Final Supplemental Environmental Impact Statement includes a range of estimates of the project’s climate impacts, and that information in the report will now need to be closely evaluated by Secretary Kerry and other relevant agency heads in the weeks ahead.”
The Keystone XL Pipeline proposes the construction of an 875-mile pipeline extending from Morgan, Montana, to Steele City, Nebraska (Fig. ES 1 from the US State Department report). The pipeline would allow delivery of up to 830,000 barrels per day (bpd) of crude oil from the Western Canadian Sedimentary Basin (WCSB) in Canada and the Bakken Shale Formation in the United States to Steele City, Nebraska. The oil would then continue to refineries on the Gulf Coast.
An economic analysis in the report suggests the project will 42,100 jobs with more than $2 billion in earnings. Construction would add $3.4 billion (0.02 percent) to the US gross domestic product (GDP).
Sandy Williams
Read more from Sandy WilliamsLatest in Economy
ISM: Manufacturing growth slows in July, hits 10-month low
US manufacturing activity slowed again in July to a 10-month low
CRU: Pushing EU imports back to 15% would be a big task
Several EU member states have published a ‘non-paper’ that puts forward proposals for a post-safeguard trade measure.
SMU Community Chat: Tariff-induced panic purchases, inflation, and calculating costs
Chief executive of the Institute for Supply Management (ISM), Tom Derry highlighted how reactive buying behavior has shifted the market into a quiet demand period. Derry presented ISM data during the weekly SMU community chat.
Architecture billings still sluggish despite project inquiry uptick
The Architecture Billings Index (ABI), a leading indicator for non-residential construction activity, declined for an eighth straight month in June.
Beige Book: Tariff pressures mount, flat outlook
All districts reported “experiencing modest to pronounced input cost pressures related to tariffs, especially for raw materials used in manufacturing and construction.”