Steel Mills

Steel Mills Cry Foul But Dumping is Hard to Prove
Written by John Packard
January 29, 2015
So far Steel Market Update has heard a similar cry in each steel mill earnings conference call. The domestic mills are not happy about the amount of foreign steel coming into the country and the growing percentage of market share foreign steel is taking from the domestic mills.
We are hearing a couple of terms which are not interchangeable but are both important pieces of the puzzle when steel mills consider filing a trade case under U.S. law. These are “dumping” and “injury” and we turned to two attorneys (Roger Schagrin and Lewis Leibowitz) who are experts on the subject to provide us insights:
Dumping means:
1) That the steel is being sold at less than their domestic market pricing or,
2) That the steel being sold is less than their cost to produce the product.
After the mills file a trade case the “Dumping” portion is found by the U.S. Department of Commerce (US DOC)
Injury means:
The domestic steel industry producing competing products is suffering real or imminent threat of material injury.
After a country or foreign mill has been found to be “dumping” then “Injury” is determined by the International Trade Commission (ITC)
A successful dumping order requires both dumping and injury.
We asked trade attorney Lewis Leibowitz about the subject of dumping and what is needed in order to file a trade case against foreign steel. Here is what he had to say:
“I want to explain this in detail. To start, a dumping order requires both dumping (found by the Commerce Dept.) and injury (found by the International Trade Commission).
“Dumping is underselling the home market price or selling below the cost of production. In a nonmarket case (e.g., China) the test is different. The home market price is not relevant. The test is based on the cost of production using the factors of production of the producer, but valued based on the costs in a market economy.
“Injury means material injury to the industry producing competing products in the US or a real and imminent threat of such injury. If half the Commissioners find injury or threat, the vote is considered affirmative.
“So both dumping and injury are required…
“The steel industry files cases sometimes that they don’t win. But they can disrupt hearken for a year by filing them.”

John Packard
Read more from John PackardLatest in Steel Mills

Cliffs plans to idle three mills, cut 950 jobs on ‘insufficient demand and pricing’
Cleveland-Cliffs plans to indefinitely idle its steel mill in Riverdale, Ill., as well as mills in Conshohocken, Pa., and Steelton, Pa. The Cleveland-based steelmaker said all three facilities would be idled on or around June 30. Approximately 950 jobs will be impacted, the company said.

CRU: Usiminas may reduce capex unless government strengthens protection
“The lack of effective measures to create fair competition, amid a surge in subsidized imports, is the main threat to the sustainability of Brazil’s steel industry and its value chain,” CEO Marcelo Chara said.

USS swings to loss in first quarter on N. American flat-rolled segment woes
U.S. Steel CEO praised the company’s resilience, “despite the seasonally low results driven by annual mining logistics constraints in our North American Flat-Rolled segment and lagging spot prices.”

Nucor gives updates on new capacity coming online
Nucor said several of its capital projects will start operations within the next year and provided an update on them.

Algoma swings to loss on ‘market challenges’ and ‘tariff uncertainties’
Canada’s Algoma Steel swung to a loss in the first quarter amid "market challenges," and the company now expects first steel production from its first EAF in the second quarter.