Steel Mills

Steel Mills Cry Foul But Dumping is Hard to Prove
Written by John Packard
January 29, 2015
So far Steel Market Update has heard a similar cry in each steel mill earnings conference call. The domestic mills are not happy about the amount of foreign steel coming into the country and the growing percentage of market share foreign steel is taking from the domestic mills.
We are hearing a couple of terms which are not interchangeable but are both important pieces of the puzzle when steel mills consider filing a trade case under U.S. law. These are “dumping” and “injury” and we turned to two attorneys (Roger Schagrin and Lewis Leibowitz) who are experts on the subject to provide us insights:
Dumping means:
1) That the steel is being sold at less than their domestic market pricing or,
2) That the steel being sold is less than their cost to produce the product.
After the mills file a trade case the “Dumping” portion is found by the U.S. Department of Commerce (US DOC)
Injury means:
The domestic steel industry producing competing products is suffering real or imminent threat of material injury.
After a country or foreign mill has been found to be “dumping” then “Injury” is determined by the International Trade Commission (ITC)
A successful dumping order requires both dumping and injury.
We asked trade attorney Lewis Leibowitz about the subject of dumping and what is needed in order to file a trade case against foreign steel. Here is what he had to say:
“I want to explain this in detail. To start, a dumping order requires both dumping (found by the Commerce Dept.) and injury (found by the International Trade Commission).
“Dumping is underselling the home market price or selling below the cost of production. In a nonmarket case (e.g., China) the test is different. The home market price is not relevant. The test is based on the cost of production using the factors of production of the producer, but valued based on the costs in a market economy.
“Injury means material injury to the industry producing competing products in the US or a real and imminent threat of such injury. If half the Commissioners find injury or threat, the vote is considered affirmative.
“So both dumping and injury are required…
“The steel industry files cases sometimes that they don’t win. But they can disrupt hearken for a year by filing them.”

John Packard
Read more from John PackardLatest in Steel Mills

AISI: April mill shipments fall, sheet down YTD
US steel mills saw a decline in shipments from March to April.

Hybar rolls first rebar, ramping up Arkansas mill commissioning
The startup steelmaker produced its first rebar at its greenfield steel mill in Osceola, Ark., marking a key milestone by completing construction in 22 months.

Goncalves: Despite higher tariffs, two Cliffs mills to remain idled
Cleveland-Cliffs Chairman, President, and CEO Lourenco Goncalves said he would keep one mill idled and still plans to idle another despite increased protections from Section 232 tariffs doubling to 50%.

Trump says Section 232 tariff on steel, aluminum to double to 50% at Pennsylvania rally celebrating Nippon-USS deal
At a rally celebrating a “planned partnership” between U.S. Steel and Nippon Steel, President Trump announced higher tariffs on steel and aluminum imports into the United States, and revealed few more details on Nippon’s investment in USS’ operations.

CRU: Trump hails a partnership of Nippon with USS
In a social media post, President Donald Trump said a planned partnership between Nippon Steel and U.S. Steel will add $14 billion to the US economy and ensure USS remains headquartered in Pittsburgh.