Trade Cases
ITC Temporarily Suspends Section 337 Case
Written by Sandy Williams
July 10, 2016
The U.S. International Trade Commission has put the Section 337 case brought by US Steel against Chinese steel companies on hold until Oct. 2, 2017.
Administrative Law Judge Dee Lord said that two of the three complaints in the case, price fixing and transshipment, belong under the purview of antidumping and countervailing duty laws that which are handled by the Commerce Department.
Inside U.S. Trade reported that the ITC decision said, “The false designation of origin claims are based on respondents’ alleged evasion of antidumping and countervailing duty orders issued by the Commerce Department, which has several ongoing investigations. The record therefore shows that the false designation at least ‘in part’ falls within the purview of antidumping and countervailing duty laws. This requires the ITC to notify the Secretary of Commerce under section 337 (b)(3), according to the order.”
Judge Lord said “there is no evidence in the record” that Commerce had been notified of the investigation as required by law.
The third claim of the 337 case, missapropriation and use of trade secrets, could result in the ITC consulting with or handing over that portion of the investigation to the Criminal Division of the Justice Department. A decision to notify the Justice Department is not required by law.
The suspension of the case means that the ITC will pause all discovery and motions for the investigation until October 2017.
In the 337 complaint, US Steel requested that the USITC issue a general exclusion order on carbon and alloy steel products imports from China, a limited exclusion order blocking imports from the named respondents in the investigation, and a cease and desist order on alleged illegal practices.
US Steel spokesperson, Sarah Cassella said, “We’re reviewing the actions the administrative law judge has taken.”
Sandy Williams
Read more from Sandy WilliamsLatest in Trade Cases
Leibowitz: With ‘reciprocal’ tariffs struck down again in court, what happens next?
President Trump’s “reciprocal” tariffs under the International Emergency Economic Policy Act (IEEPA) were struck down again, this time on Aug. 29 by the Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit (CAFC). The legal and policy mess continues, with the next stop being the US Supreme Court.
Market unfazed by US circuit court’s IEEPA decision
Repealing any reciprocal tariffs placed by President Donald Trump on US imports of direct reduced iron (DRI), iron ore, hot-briquetted iron (HBI), and pig iron would have only a nominal impact on the US steel market, market participants said.
ITC votes to keep HR duties after sunset review
The US government determined this week that hot-rolled steel imports from a handful of countries continue to threaten the domestic steel industry.
Steel Summit: Zekelman advocates for ‘Fortress North America’
Barry Zekelman has a unique vantage point from which to view today’s trade landscape. A Canadian national who owns operations in both the US and Canada, he has also had dialogue with both Canadian and American administrations.
Steel Summit: Execs urge clarity on trade/tariff policy, want stronger USMCA
Tariff policy dominated the discussion of the SMU Steel Summit trade panel on Tuesday afternoon. The message was clear: uncertainty is rattling the steel supply chain.