Trade Cases
AISI CEO Tells Senators China’s Unfair Trade Must Stop
Written by Sandy Williams
July 13, 2016
AISI, WASHINGTON, D.C. – Thomas J. Gibson, president and CEO of the American Iron and Steel Institute (AISI), today testified before the Senate Banking Committee’s hearing on “Evaluating the Financial Risks of China.” Gibson highlighted global steel overcapacity, market distortions created by China’s state-controlled steel industry and China’s market economy status, among other issues. The committee is chaired by Sen. Richard Shelby (R-AL), and the ranking member is Sen. Sherrod Brown (D-OH), both of whom represent states with a strong steel presence.
“The surge in imports is a result of foreign government interventionist policies that have fueled global overcapacity in steel, more than half of which is located in China. This has led to increased imports of dumped and subsidized Chinese steel in the U.S., which have injured the American steel industry,” Gibson said. “While China is not the only source of the problem, the overcapacity in China is the greatest challenge facing the global steel industry today.”
Gibson said with China’s domestic steel demand declining, the Chinese steel industry has increasingly relied on exports to consume surplus production. Chinese steel exports rose to 112 million metric tons last year, and through May of this year Chinese producers exported 46.3 million metric tons of steel to the world.
“In addition to the excess steel capacity growth not being supported by demand, it is also not supported by profitability. China’s dramatic increase in steel capacity has occurred despite financial returns that are well below those achieved by other steel industries, and even other industries in China,” Gibson said, adding that China’s major steel firms reportedly lost more than $15.5 billion last year alone.
Unlike market-based companies, Chinese state-owned companies can run massive debts because the Chinese government will often direct their state-controlled banks to continually refinance the debt, and ultimately sweep it off the books and into state-created financial firms designed to absorb bad corporate debts and cover losses in Chinese enterprises, he said.
“The steel industry is an example of what can happen to the broader global economy if China does not address its market distortions. For its own sake and that of the global economy, China must implement steps to deflate the country’s debt bubble,” Gibson said.
Gibson made five policy recommendations for the U.S. government, including: vigorously enforcing U.S. trade laws, continuing to treat China as a non-market economy, and pressing for binding commitments from China and other countries to eliminate excess capacity and subsidies.
Other witnesses were: The Honorable Dennis C. Shea, Chairman, U.S.-China Economic and Security Review Commission; Dr. Desmond Lachman, Resident Fellow, American Enterprise Institute; and, Dr. William T. Wilson, Senior Research Fellow, The Heritage Foundation.
Link to Gibson’s full testimony can be found here.
Sandy Williams
Read more from Sandy WilliamsLatest in Trade Cases
Price on Trade: The foolishness of free trade with controlled economies
It was only a matter of time before a shutdown happened. And, no, we aren’t talking about the federal government’s lapse in appropriations. On Oct. 9, Beijing announced a series of restrictions that will effectively shut down exports of rare earth elements, magnets, and certain downstream products vital to advanced manufacturing.
Trump pulls plug on trade talks with Canada after anti-tariff Reagan ad
US President Donald Trump took to social media late Thursday night to announce he was canceling trade talks with Canada.
Leibowitz: Renewed trade war with China over rare earths
On Oct.10, President Trump announced major increases in tariffs on Chinese goods. The trigger was a new regime of export controls on rare earth metals and products using those elements, including magnets, capital equipment, and catalysts for catalytic converters in cars and trucks.
Industry piles on new Section 232 steel derivative inclusion requests
The Department of Commerce received 97 submissions from producers, manufacturers, and groups seeking Section 232 tariff coverage for steel and aluminum derivative products.
Price on Trade: New EU steel tariffs don’t mean the US should weaken its stance
Any steel imports into the EU that exceed the new, lower quota level would be subject to a 50% tariff, which represents a major increase from the EU’s current 25% out-of-quota tariff. This move would largely align the EU’s steel tariff rate with Canada and the United States.