Trade Cases

US DOC Finds Dumping of Imports of Heavy Walled Rectangular Welded Pipe
Written by John Packard
July 17, 2016
On Friday, July 15th, the U.S. Department of Commerce announced its affirmative final determinations in the antidumping (AD) investigations of heavy walled rectangular welded carbon steel pipe and tubes from Korea, Mexico and Turkey, and the countervailing duty (CVD) on imports of the same products from Turkey.
The following determinations came directly from the U.S. Department of Commerce “fact sheet:”
As a reminder to our readers, antidumping occurs when a foreign company sells a product in the United States at less than its fair value. For the purpose of countervailing duty investigations, a countervailable subsidy is financial assistance from a foreign government that benefits the production of goods from foreign companies and is limited to specific enterprises or industries, or is contingent either upon export performance or upon the use of domestic goods over imported goods.
In the Korea investigation, Commerce found dumping has occurred by mandatory respondents Dong-A Steel Company and HiSteel Co., Ltd. at dumping margins of 2.34 percent and 3.82 percent, respectively. Commerce calculated a final dumping margin of 3.24 percent for all other producers/exporters in Korea.
In the Mexico investigation, Commerce found dumping has occurred by mandatory respondents Maquilacero S.A. de C.V. and Productos Laminados de Monterrey S.A. de C.V. at dumping margins of 3.83 percent and 5.21 percent, respectively. Commerce calculated a final dumping margin of 4.91 percent for all other producers/exporters in Mexico.
In the Turkey AD investigation, Commerce found dumping has occurred by mandatory respondent MMZ Boru Profil Uretim Sanayi Ve Tic. A.S. (MMZ) at a dumping margin of 35.66 percent. Commerce determined that MMZ’s final dumping margin was based on adverse facts available as a result of its failure to cooperate to the best of its ability in the investigation. Additionally, Commerce determined that no dumping has occurred by mandatory respondent Ozdemir Boru Profil San. Ve Tic. Ltd. Sti. (Ozdemir). Because Commerce calculated a weighted-average dumping margin of zero for Ozdemir, it would be excluded from an AD order. Commerce calculated a final dumping margin of 17.83 percent for all other producers/exporters in Turkey.
In the Turkey CVD investigation, Commerce calculated final subsidy rates of 23.37 percent and 15.08 percent for mandatory respondents MMZ and Ozdemir, respectively. Commerce calculated a final subsidy rate of 19.06 percent for all other producers/exporters in Turkey.
As a result of the affirmative final AD determinations, Commerce will instruct U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) to collect cash deposits equal to the applicable weighted-average dumping margins, except where these rates are zero or de minimis. Further, as a result of the affirmative final CVD determination, if the U.S. International Trade Commission (ITC) issues an affirmative injury determination, Commerce will order the resumption of the suspension of liquidation and will require cash deposits for CVD duties equal to the final subsidy rates established during the investigation. For Turkey, Commerce will also adjust the AD cash deposit rates by the amount of the CVD export subsidies, where appropriate. If the U.S. International Trade Commission (ITC) issues negative injury determinations, the investigations will be terminated and no producers or exporters will be subject to future cash deposits for either AD or CVD duties. In such an event, all previously collected cash deposits will be refunded.
The petitioners for these investigations are Atlas Tube, a division of JMC Steel Group (IL); Bull Moose Tube Company (MO); EXLTUBE1 (MO); Hannibal Industries, Inc. (CA); Independence Tube Corporation (IL); Maruichi.

John Packard
Read more from John PackardLatest in Trade Cases

Price on Trade: IEEPA tariffs head to the Supreme Court, DOJ ramps up trade enforcement
International trade law and policy remain a hot topic in Washington and beyond this week. We are paying special attention to the ongoing litigation of the president’s tariff policies and the administration’s efforts to heighten trade enforcement.

Mexico considers stiff tariffs for steel, autos, and other imports
Mexico is considering imposing steep tariffs on imports of steel, automobiles, and over 1,400 other products. Its target? Countries with which it does not have free trade agreements, mainly China, India, Thailand, and other South Asian nations.

Leibowitz: With ‘reciprocal’ tariffs struck down again in court, what happens next?
President Trump’s “reciprocal” tariffs under the International Emergency Economic Policy Act (IEEPA) were struck down again, this time on Aug. 29 by the Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit (CAFC). The legal and policy mess continues, with the next stop being the US Supreme Court.

Market unfazed by US circuit court’s IEEPA decision
Repealing any reciprocal tariffs placed by President Donald Trump on US imports of direct reduced iron (DRI), iron ore, hot-briquetted iron (HBI), and pig iron would have only a nominal impact on the US steel market, market participants said.

ITC votes to keep HR duties after sunset review
The US government determined this week that hot-rolled steel imports from a handful of countries continue to threaten the domestic steel industry.