Trade Cases
Letter to the Editor: Question About Circumvention Complaints
Written by John Packard
September 22, 2016
We might as well get the debate started. The circumvention complaints against Vietnam have prompted comments and a healthy discussion is needed as the industry tries to wrap its collective mind around the facts of the latest request of the US Department of Commerce to stop Vietnamese exports of cold rolled and coated steels. We received the following letter to the editor earlier this evening.
It was reported today that two US steel producers have requested that the DOC find that China is circumventing anti dumping and countervailing duties on cold rolled coils and coated material by processing HRC in Vietnam. More detailed filing is said to follow.
Now that alone wasn’t that big of a news to me but what caught my interest was the statement that “China is shipping its product into Vietnam for minor processing “. For many years the emerging steel producing nations like Indonesia, Malaysia and Vietnam have been supplied by the Japanese and the Koreans with hot rolled coils and cold rolled coils for conversion into coated products or pipe and tubing. The fact that the Chinese are supplying Vietnam with hot rolled coils is only logical, they are the cheapest producers. They are supplying billets to many customers in the world who find it to be cheaper to import the billets than making them themselves. What’s wrong with that?
For many years the Koreans imported steel from other countries explicitly for the conversion into other products for export because they couldn’t compete anymore if they had to buy from domestic mills. This created thousands of jobs in Korea in the manufacturing industry and enabled many companies to export their products worldwide and at the same time kept the domestic price level fairly high.
Maybe an idea which we should try here in the USA?
We welcome your comments which can be sent to SMU at: info@SteelMarketUpdate.com
John Packard
Read more from John PackardLatest in Trade Cases
Price on Trade: IEEPA tariffs head to the Supreme Court, DOJ ramps up trade enforcement
International trade law and policy remain a hot topic in Washington and beyond this week. We are paying special attention to the ongoing litigation of the president’s tariff policies and the administration’s efforts to heighten trade enforcement.
Mexico considers stiff tariffs for steel, autos, and other imports
Mexico is considering imposing steep tariffs on imports of steel, automobiles, and over 1,400 other products. Its target? Countries with which it does not have free trade agreements, mainly China, India, Thailand, and other South Asian nations.
Leibowitz: With ‘reciprocal’ tariffs struck down again in court, what happens next?
President Trump’s “reciprocal” tariffs under the International Emergency Economic Policy Act (IEEPA) were struck down again, this time on Aug. 29 by the Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit (CAFC). The legal and policy mess continues, with the next stop being the US Supreme Court.
Market unfazed by US circuit court’s IEEPA decision
Repealing any reciprocal tariffs placed by President Donald Trump on US imports of direct reduced iron (DRI), iron ore, hot-briquetted iron (HBI), and pig iron would have only a nominal impact on the US steel market, market participants said.
ITC votes to keep HR duties after sunset review
The US government determined this week that hot-rolled steel imports from a handful of countries continue to threaten the domestic steel industry.