Trade Cases
CORE Anti-Circumvention Determinations Delayed
Written by Sandy Williams
August 31, 2017
The Commerce Department has extended the deadline for determinations in the anti-circumvention investigation of corrosion-resistant steel from China to Feb. 15, 2018.
On Nov. 14, 2016, the anti-circumvention case was initiated on CORE steel products from the People’s Republic of China in response to a request from steel companies ArcelorMittal USA, Nucor, U.S. Steel, AK Steel, Steel Dynamics, Inc., and California Steel Industries.
The group charged that hot and cold rolled steel produced in China was being sent to Vietnam where it was processed into corrosion-resistant steel products and then sent to the U.S. under Vietnam origin, circumventing the AD/CVD duties placed on imports of steel from the PRC.
Commerce has determined that more time is necessary to solicit and analyze information related to the investigation.
Washington trade attorney Lewis Leibowitz was not surprised by the delay, noting the investigation was stalled for nearly six months. “There are two major issues in this case,” said Leibowitz, “China substrate and ‘substantial transformation.'”
Philip Bell, president of the Steel Manufacturers Association, acknowledged at SMU’s Steel Summit Conference that any exports from Vietnam could not be covered by circumvention unless Chinese substrate were used in the material coming to the U.S. SMA represents domestic EAF steel producers.
“That is absolutely correct, in my opinion,” said Leibowitz. “Commerce must accept this limitation on their authority to find circumvention or they will violate the law.”
“On substantial transformation, if HRC is imported into Vietnam, and CORE is entered into the U.S., there are at least two substantial transformations: hot rolled to cold rolled and cold rolled to coated, corrosion resistant steel. The applicable statute requires a finding that any addition to value in Vietnam must be ‘minor.’ It seems clear to me that a process that results in a substantial transformation cannot be ‘minor.’ That is an issue Commerce will need to address.
“Finally, the ability of WTO member countries to impose antidumping and countervailing duties on new countries through ‘circumvention’ is an open issue. No court has ruled on that one way or the other. Vietnam will surely challenge any such finding and could well prevail.”
Sandy Williams
Read more from Sandy WilliamsLatest in Trade Cases
Price on Trade: The foolishness of free trade with controlled economies
It was only a matter of time before a shutdown happened. And, no, we aren’t talking about the federal government’s lapse in appropriations. On Oct. 9, Beijing announced a series of restrictions that will effectively shut down exports of rare earth elements, magnets, and certain downstream products vital to advanced manufacturing.
Trump pulls plug on trade talks with Canada after anti-tariff Reagan ad
US President Donald Trump took to social media late Thursday night to announce he was canceling trade talks with Canada.
Leibowitz: Renewed trade war with China over rare earths
On Oct.10, President Trump announced major increases in tariffs on Chinese goods. The trigger was a new regime of export controls on rare earth metals and products using those elements, including magnets, capital equipment, and catalysts for catalytic converters in cars and trucks.
Industry piles on new Section 232 steel derivative inclusion requests
The Department of Commerce received 97 submissions from producers, manufacturers, and groups seeking Section 232 tariff coverage for steel and aluminum derivative products.
Price on Trade: New EU steel tariffs don’t mean the US should weaken its stance
Any steel imports into the EU that exceed the new, lower quota level would be subject to a 50% tariff, which represents a major increase from the EU’s current 25% out-of-quota tariff. This move would largely align the EU’s steel tariff rate with Canada and the United States.