Trade Cases
Judge Terminates Part of U.S. Steel's Section 337 Claim
Written by Sandy Williams
October 4, 2017
U.S. Steel’s Section 337 petition took another blow this week when Administrative Law Judge Dee Lord terminated the trans-shipment claim that accused China of misrepresenting country of origin on steel imports.
Lord had dismissed the claim in January, citing lack of evidence by U.S. Steel to support its allegations. The claim was remanded to Lord by the International Trade Commission to review the circumstantial evidence that U.S. Steel provided, which the ITC decided was sufficient enough to warrant another review.
In August, the Chinese steel producers targeted in the case all filed motions requesting a “summary determination,” arguing there was no evidence of false designation of origin.
Lord’s Oct. 2 decision granting summary judgment cancels the scheduled Oct. 16 trial and excuses the respondents from any trade remedies. The decision can be appealed by U.S. Steel, which would send the claim back to the ITC to be upheld or reversed. If it is upheld by the ITC, U.S. Steel has the option to appeal to the federal circuit court.
The original 337 petition included three claims—false designation of origin, anti-trust (price-fixing), and theft of trade secrets. Only the anti-trust claim remains to be resolved after the trade secrets complaint was withdrawn by U.S. Steel in February. Lord dismissed the antitrust claim but, after appeal, it was returned to the ITC. A determination by the commission is forthcoming and could reaffirm the dismissal or send it back to Lord for further review.
Sources close to the case gave differing views on the outcome to Inside U.S. Trade. One source said the decision shows “the inequality of resources of a private company pitted against the full force and statecraft of a sovereign nation.”
Another source told Inside U.S. Trade, “The commission bent over backwards to give U.S. Steel an opportunity to provide evidence for its claim and they failed to do it.”
Sandy Williams
Read more from Sandy WilliamsLatest in Trade Cases
Price on Trade: IEEPA tariffs head to the Supreme Court, DOJ ramps up trade enforcement
International trade law and policy remain a hot topic in Washington and beyond this week. We are paying special attention to the ongoing litigation of the president’s tariff policies and the administration’s efforts to heighten trade enforcement.
Mexico considers stiff tariffs for steel, autos, and other imports
Mexico is considering imposing steep tariffs on imports of steel, automobiles, and over 1,400 other products. Its target? Countries with which it does not have free trade agreements, mainly China, India, Thailand, and other South Asian nations.
Leibowitz: With ‘reciprocal’ tariffs struck down again in court, what happens next?
President Trump’s “reciprocal” tariffs under the International Emergency Economic Policy Act (IEEPA) were struck down again, this time on Aug. 29 by the Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit (CAFC). The legal and policy mess continues, with the next stop being the US Supreme Court.
Market unfazed by US circuit court’s IEEPA decision
Repealing any reciprocal tariffs placed by President Donald Trump on US imports of direct reduced iron (DRI), iron ore, hot-briquetted iron (HBI), and pig iron would have only a nominal impact on the US steel market, market participants said.
ITC votes to keep HR duties after sunset review
The US government determined this week that hot-rolled steel imports from a handful of countries continue to threaten the domestic steel industry.