Trade Cases
Commerce: China's Still a Non-market Economy
Written by Sandy Williams
October 30, 2017
Market economy status for China is out of the question, according to a 205-page memo from the Commerce Department.
The detailed memorandum, published on Oct. 26, was released just days before President Trump is to meet with Chinese President Xi Jinping and in close timing with a preliminary AD/CVD determination against China regarding imports of aluminum foil.
China joined the World Trade Organization in December 2001 under a stipulation that it would be temporarily treated as a non-market economy (NME), allowing other WTO members to subject it to stringent treatment in calculating antidumping duties. The expiration date for that ruling passed on Dec. 22, 2016, and China continues to struggle for market economy recognition and the potential relief it would provide from an onslaught of dumping and countervailing duties that have been levied against its exports.
The memo from Commerce lists six U.S. criteria that China fails to meet in its bid to become a market economy.
-
Commerce maintains that although China has made strides to become “market-oriented,” it still has “significant restrictions on capital account transactions” and intervenes “considerably” in onshore and offshore FOREX markets.
-
China controls wage rates, prohibits independent trade unions and strikes, and limits the mobility of its labor force.
-
China continues to impose significant barriers to foreign investment.
-
State-invested enterprises (state-owned) continue to be prevalent throughout China’s economy, subverting normal market principles of supply and demand.
-
The Chinese government controls resource allocation and pricing, employing various mechanisms to influence economic outcomes.
-
China’s legal system functions as an “instrument by which the Chinese government and the CCP can secure discrete economic outcomes, channel broader economic policy, and pursue industrial policy goals.”
“China’s institutional structure and the control the Chinese government and the CCP exercise through that structure result in fundamental economic distortions, such that non-market conditions prevail in the operation of China’s economy,” states the memorandum.
The non-market conditions are “deeply entrenched” within the Chinese government and are built on a legal mandate “to maintain a leading role for the state sector” wrote Commerce.
“Accordingly, China is a NME country. It does not operate sufficiently on market principles to permit the use of Chinese prices and costs for purposes of the Commerce Department’s antidumping analysis.”
Sandy Williams
Read more from Sandy WilliamsLatest in Trade Cases
Price on Trade: The foolishness of free trade with controlled economies
It was only a matter of time before a shutdown happened. And, no, we aren’t talking about the federal government’s lapse in appropriations. On Oct. 9, Beijing announced a series of restrictions that will effectively shut down exports of rare earth elements, magnets, and certain downstream products vital to advanced manufacturing.
Trump pulls plug on trade talks with Canada after anti-tariff Reagan ad
US President Donald Trump took to social media late Thursday night to announce he was canceling trade talks with Canada.
Leibowitz: Renewed trade war with China over rare earths
On Oct.10, President Trump announced major increases in tariffs on Chinese goods. The trigger was a new regime of export controls on rare earth metals and products using those elements, including magnets, capital equipment, and catalysts for catalytic converters in cars and trucks.
Industry piles on new Section 232 steel derivative inclusion requests
The Department of Commerce received 97 submissions from producers, manufacturers, and groups seeking Section 232 tariff coverage for steel and aluminum derivative products.
Price on Trade: New EU steel tariffs don’t mean the US should weaken its stance
Any steel imports into the EU that exceed the new, lower quota level would be subject to a 50% tariff, which represents a major increase from the EU’s current 25% out-of-quota tariff. This move would largely align the EU’s steel tariff rate with Canada and the United States.