Trade Cases
Appeals for Tariff Exclusions Already in the Works
Written by Tim Triplett
March 15, 2018
Companies that import steel products can apply for relief from President Trump’s tariff immediately, even before the Commerce Department issues formal procedures, recommends Washington trade attorney Lewis Leibowitz. “I see no reason to wait for detailed procedures to come out from Commerce. A letter to the Secretary should suffice to get started,” he said.
The Commerce Department is working on procedures for parties to apply for exclusion from the 25 percent tariff on steel imports signed by President Trump on March 8. The procedures are to be issued by March 18, 10 days from the president’s proclamation. The tariffs are scheduled to become effective on March 23.
The proclamation on steel sets out the following criteria for product exclusions: “[The Commerce Secretary] is hereby authorized to provide relief from the additional duties set forth in … this proclamation for any steel article determined not to be produced in the United States in a sufficient and reasonably available amount or of a satisfactory quality and is also authorized to provide such relief based upon specific national security considerations. Such relief shall be provided for a steel article only after a request for exclusion is made by a directly affected party located in the United States.”
There is some precedent for tariff exclusions. In the safeguard tariff regime of 2002-03, exclusions were granted on more than 400 products, Leibowitz said. Generally, duties were refunded retroactively after the exclusions were approved. “We don’t know if that will be repeated this time. The situation is very muddled.”
Parties seeking relief should base their claims on the key words in the proclamation: products not sufficiently available or of satisfactory quality in the U.S. Note that price is not mentioned as a criterion, Leibowitz said.
There are reports that companies and countries are already negotiating to be excluded from the tariffs, but no real sign of movement yet. Republican Sen. Jeff Flake of Arizona, an opponent of Trump’s tariffs on steel and aluminum, reportedly has introduced legislation to nullify them, though the bill’s text is not available, Leibowitz added.
Tim Triplett
Read more from Tim TriplettLatest in Trade Cases
Price on Trade: IEEPA tariffs head to the Supreme Court, DOJ ramps up trade enforcement
International trade law and policy remain a hot topic in Washington and beyond this week. We are paying special attention to the ongoing litigation of the president’s tariff policies and the administration’s efforts to heighten trade enforcement.
Mexico considers stiff tariffs for steel, autos, and other imports
Mexico is considering imposing steep tariffs on imports of steel, automobiles, and over 1,400 other products. Its target? Countries with which it does not have free trade agreements, mainly China, India, Thailand, and other South Asian nations.
Leibowitz: With ‘reciprocal’ tariffs struck down again in court, what happens next?
President Trump’s “reciprocal” tariffs under the International Emergency Economic Policy Act (IEEPA) were struck down again, this time on Aug. 29 by the Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit (CAFC). The legal and policy mess continues, with the next stop being the US Supreme Court.
Market unfazed by US circuit court’s IEEPA decision
Repealing any reciprocal tariffs placed by President Donald Trump on US imports of direct reduced iron (DRI), iron ore, hot-briquetted iron (HBI), and pig iron would have only a nominal impact on the US steel market, market participants said.
ITC votes to keep HR duties after sunset review
The US government determined this week that hot-rolled steel imports from a handful of countries continue to threaten the domestic steel industry.