Trade Cases
WTO in Uproar Over Tariffs
Written by Sandy Williams
March 24, 2018
More than 40 members of the World Trade Organization took the floor at a meeting of the Council on Trade in Goods on Friday to voice their concerns over U.S. tariffs on steel and aluminum.
Members warned that the measures would have repercussions “not only on traders’ commercial interests but also on the predictability and stability of the rules-based multilateral trading system.”
China argued that the U.S. tariffs ignored information demonstrating that steel and aluminum imports do not affect national security.
Russia said the new tariffs exceed the rates the U.S. had committed to under the WTO agreement and sought clarification on how exempting some WTO members from the tariffs and not others could be justified under WTO rules.
The U.S. responded that the quantities of imports and circumstances of global excess capacity for producing steel and aluminum “threaten to impair the national security” and that tariffs were necessary to address the situation. The U.S. added that relief from duties was authorized for steel and aluminum products that are not produced in sufficient quantity or quality in the United States. The WTO members that were exempted temporarily from tariffs were those with which the U.S. has a “security relationship,” said the U.S. official.
Director-General Roberto Azevedo issued the following statement: “At today’s meeting of the Council on Trade in Goods, WTO members reviewed and discussed many of the most pressing trade issues of the moment, including a number of the specific tensions that have arisen between different members in recent weeks. It is positive to see members continuing to use the WTO as a place to discuss these issues.
“I encourage members to continue working through the WTO’s many forums and mechanisms to deal with their concerns and explore potential solutions. Actions taken outside these collective processes greatly increase the risk of escalation in a confrontation that will have no winners, and which could quickly lead to a less stable trading system. Disrupting trade flows will jeopardize the global economy at a time when economic recovery, though fragile, has been increasingly evident around the world. I again call for restraint and urgent dialogue as the best path forward to resolve these problems.”
Sandy Williams
Read more from Sandy WilliamsLatest in Trade Cases
US and Canada expect positive outcomes from tariff negotiations
Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney and US President Donald Trump told reporters at the White House on Tuesday that they’ll be formulating a trade deal that works for both nations.
Leibowitz: When the shutdown should end
There is no doubt that the current government shutdown reflects the vast divisions between the extremes of American politics, society, and even geography. Almost all Americans agree that government is necessary, but voters disagree...
Price: The U.S. Steel shutdown that wasn’t and a call to stop ‘valuation cheating’
How can the U.S. government block U.S. Steel’s Granite City rolling mill closure without harming other American steelmakers? Reducing imports should be the first step. Foreign producers continue to aggressively target the U.S. market, especially now as they find themselves displaced by Chinese exports.
US steel industry applauds ITC final determination in coated trade case
Domestic mills praised the US International Trade Commission’s (ITC's) final determination that imports of corrosion-resistant (CORE) steel from 10 countries pose a threat to them.
ITC’s final ruling: Dumped, subsidized CORE imports are harming domestic market
The US International Trade Commission (ITC) finds that corrosion resistant steel (CORE) imports from 10 countries have caused material damage to domestic product producers, according to the ITC’s statement.