Trade Cases

Commerce Inundated with Tariff Exclusion Requests
Written by Tim Triplett
May 10, 2018
Thousands of manufacturers, big and small, have filed paperwork with the Commerce Department requesting that their products be exempted from the 25 percent tariff on steel imports and 10 percent tariff on aluminum imports. Their argument is that their product must be imported because it is not produced in the United States in a sufficient and reasonably available amount or that it is essential for the nation’s security. Commerce is struggling to process the high volume of requests, leaving applicants to wonder when and how their fate will be determined.
One producer, which relies on raw materials from its parent company located outside the United States, filed its exemption request on in early April. Domestic competitors then had 30 days to comment. “The government now has 90 days to make a decision, but nobody knows what that process is about,” said a spokesperson for the filer. “The big question on the table at this point is, now what? If the U.S. industry says it can make the product, is that the end of it, or is there a verification process?”
A search of regulations.gov indicates that 2,527 requests for exclusions had been posted for public comment as of May 10.
A bipartisan group of 39 House members sent a letter to Commerce Secretary Wilbur Ross on May 7 urging him to streamline the review process and provide certainty and relief to the thousands of businesses impacted by the tariffs. Among their recommendations are for Commerce to allow trade associations to apply for exclusions for an industry, and to allow exclusions covering ranges of certain product dimensions with the same HTS code. They also urged the department to clear up misunderstandings over the forms, which contain confusing and contradictory requests.
“It is never going to work to have the U.S. government deciding who can import into this country. A lot of people feel this whole process is very difficult,” commented the spokesperson.

Tim Triplett
Read more from Tim TriplettLatest in Trade Cases

Leibowitz: Tariffs are the trade version of going nuclear
In short, when tariffs go up, jobs in consuming industries go down. There is conclusive evidence from past actions: safeguard tariffs in 2002 and Section 232 tariffs in 2018. It is happening again in 2025. The Trump administration wants foreign producers (and US retailers) to absorb tariff increases (except in antidumping cases, where foreign absorption of tariffs is illegal).

Nippon exec responds after Trump ‘golden share’ comments: Report
A Nippon executive has hit back regarding the deal for USS following President Trump's talk of a "golden share" on Thursday.

US rebar producers seek import relief with new trade case
The four countries targeted for duties are currently the top offshore suppliers of rebar to the US market: Algeria, Bulgaria, Egypt, and Vietnam.

CRU Insight: A 50% S232 tariff will raise US steel prices and shift trade flows
This CRU Insight examines how the increase in Section 232 tariffs on steel to challenging levels will lead to significatively higher prices for end consumers in the US market.

Canacero hits out at new US steel tariffs
Mexican steel trade group Canacero has condemned the US’ actions of raising tariffs on steel and aluminum to 50% from 25%.