Trade Cases

Cumbersome Product Exclusion Process Prompts Call for Relief from House Members
Written by Tim Triplett
May 10, 2018
In a bipartisan letter to Commerce Secretary Wilbur Ross on Monday, 39 members of the House argued that the process for reviewing Section 232 tariff exclusion requests is moving far too slowly. They urged Commerce to streamline the process and provide certainty and relief to the thousands of small businesses impacted by the tariffs.
Commerce announced the exclusion process on March 18 and since then has accepted thousands of applications. However, as of May 4, only 1,572 steel applications had been posted for public comment. It is clear more changes are needed, stated the House members, proposing a 10-point plan, paraphrased below:
- Provide relief to those experiencing undue delays by extending relief retroactive to the date of submission or the date the application was considered complete;
- Allow exclusions covering ranges of certain dimensions with the same Harmonized Tariff Schedule (HTS) code in order to clear up misunderstandings over the form, which contains confusing and contradictory requests.
- Allow trade associations to apply for exclusions for an industry to save manufacturers the time and money spent filing and the Bureau of Industry and Security (BIS) the time spent reviewing duplicative applications;
- Take measures to protect sensitive information and trade secrets by excluding unnecessary application requirements such as metallurgical composition;
- Provide timely information to companies requesting exclusions, including status and anticipated wait time;
- Publish a “FAQ” page clarifying the exclusion request process;
- Incorporate the grandfathering of existing contracts in evaluating exclusion applications to avoid undue disruption to the operations of U.S. companies that are already relying on qualified suppliers of needed inputs;
- Regularly review the impact of tariffs on the economy and downstream users and implement a plan to sunset them if they prove to have a significant negative impact;
- Consider the needs of U.S. manufacturers for custom-made and other specialized steel and aluminum inputs, many of which are not available from domestic producers;
- And authorize all companies granted product exclusions to import tariff-free from any source country unless it is proven to be unfairly traded, given that the basis of the exclusion request is that the U.S. company cannot source the product domestically.

Tim Triplett
Read more from Tim TriplettLatest in Trade Cases

Market unfazed by US circuit court’s IEEPA decision
Repealing any reciprocal tariffs placed by President Donald Trump on US imports of direct reduced iron (DRI), iron ore, hot-briquetted iron (HBI), and pig iron would have only a nominal impact on the US steel market, market participants said.

ITC votes to keep HR duties after sunset review
The US government determined this week that hot-rolled steel imports from a handful of countries continue to threaten the domestic steel industry.

Steel Summit: Zekelman advocates for ‘Fortress North America’
Barry Zekelman has a unique vantage point from which to view today’s trade landscape. A Canadian national who owns operations in both the US and Canada, he has also had dialogue with both Canadian and American administrations.

Steel Summit: Execs urge clarity on trade/tariff policy, want stronger USMCA
Tariff policy dominated the discussion of the SMU Steel Summit trade panel on Tuesday afternoon. The message was clear: uncertainty is rattling the steel supply chain.

Final AD/CVD margins announced in coated steel trade case
The Commerce Department announced the final anti-dumping and countervailing duty (CVD) margins in the sprawling trade case investigating corrosion-resistant steel imports.