Trade Cases
Trump Threatens Tariffs on $11 Billion of EU Imports in Aircraft Subsidies Dispute
Written by Tim Triplett
April 11, 2019
The Trump administration is threatening to impose tariffs of up to 100 percent on goods imported from the European Union as early as this summer in a long-running dispute over aircraft subsidies.
A preliminary list of goods that could be affected covers every major product group. Deadline for comments on the list is May 28. Importers of affected goods should accelerate efforts to mitigate the impact of any potential tariff increase, such as working to have their products omitted from the final list or considering alternative sources, reported the Washington law firm of Sandler, Travis & Rosenberg.
A World Trade Organization arbitrator is expected to issue a final decision this summer on the amount of countermeasures the U.S. may impose against the EU for its failure to fully withdraw subsidized financing to Airbus, previously found to be inconsistent with WTO rules and harmful to U.S. interests.
To enable the U.S. to “respond immediately” when that decision is announced, the Office of the U.S. Trade Representative is beginning the process of identifying EU products to which additional tariffs of up to 100 percent may be applied. The preliminary list includes 317 tariff lines when imported from any of the 28 EU member states as well as nine tariff lines covering helicopters, aircraft, and aircraft parts when imported from France, Germany, Spain or the United Kingdom.
The estimated import value of the goods on the preliminary list was approximately $21 billion in 2018. However, the final list will reflect only the amount of trade found to be adversely affected in the arbitrator’s decision, which may be higher or lower than the $11.2 billion the U.S. has requested. Retaliatory tariffs imposed on goods included in the final list will only be lifted “when the EU ends these harmful subsidies,” stated USTR.
USTR is inviting public input on any aspect of the proposed retaliation, including (1) products that should be retained, removed or added; (2) how high tariffs should be raised; (3) the aggregate level of trade to be covered by additional tariffs; and (4) whether higher tariffs might harm U.S. stakeholders, including small businesses and consumers. Comments on these issues are due by May 28. USTR is also holding a hearing May 15 in Washington, D.C.
Tim Triplett
Read more from Tim TriplettLatest in Trade Cases
Industry piles on new Section 232 steel derivative inclusion requests
The Department of Commerce received 97 submissions from producers, manufacturers, and groups seeking Section 232 tariff coverage for steel and aluminum derivative products.
Price on Trade: New EU steel tariffs don’t mean the US should weaken its stance
Any steel imports into the EU that exceed the new, lower quota level would be subject to a 50% tariff, which represents a major increase from the EU’s current 25% out-of-quota tariff. This move would largely align the EU’s steel tariff rate with Canada and the United States.
Global steel forum sets 2026 framework deadline as US ups pressure on excess capacity
Global steelmakers sounded the alarm Friday over the deepening excess steelmaking capacity crisis. Ministers at the Global Forum on Steel Excess Capacity (GFSEC) in Gqeberha, South Africa, pledged to...
CRU: China’s indirect steel exports find new destination markets
The boom in China’s direct steel exports has not stopped this year, even with a rise in protectionist measures globally. The increase is driven by...
U.S. Steel sues Algoma over iron pellet shipments
U.S. Steel is suing Algoma over the Canadian flat-rolled producer's rejection of iron pellet shipments, arguing it has breached its contract.