Trade Cases
Trump Threatens Tariffs on $11 Billion of EU Imports in Aircraft Subsidies Dispute
Written by Tim Triplett
April 11, 2019
The Trump administration is threatening to impose tariffs of up to 100 percent on goods imported from the European Union as early as this summer in a long-running dispute over aircraft subsidies.
A preliminary list of goods that could be affected covers every major product group. Deadline for comments on the list is May 28. Importers of affected goods should accelerate efforts to mitigate the impact of any potential tariff increase, such as working to have their products omitted from the final list or considering alternative sources, reported the Washington law firm of Sandler, Travis & Rosenberg.
A World Trade Organization arbitrator is expected to issue a final decision this summer on the amount of countermeasures the U.S. may impose against the EU for its failure to fully withdraw subsidized financing to Airbus, previously found to be inconsistent with WTO rules and harmful to U.S. interests.
To enable the U.S. to “respond immediately” when that decision is announced, the Office of the U.S. Trade Representative is beginning the process of identifying EU products to which additional tariffs of up to 100 percent may be applied. The preliminary list includes 317 tariff lines when imported from any of the 28 EU member states as well as nine tariff lines covering helicopters, aircraft, and aircraft parts when imported from France, Germany, Spain or the United Kingdom.
The estimated import value of the goods on the preliminary list was approximately $21 billion in 2018. However, the final list will reflect only the amount of trade found to be adversely affected in the arbitrator’s decision, which may be higher or lower than the $11.2 billion the U.S. has requested. Retaliatory tariffs imposed on goods included in the final list will only be lifted “when the EU ends these harmful subsidies,” stated USTR.
USTR is inviting public input on any aspect of the proposed retaliation, including (1) products that should be retained, removed or added; (2) how high tariffs should be raised; (3) the aggregate level of trade to be covered by additional tariffs; and (4) whether higher tariffs might harm U.S. stakeholders, including small businesses and consumers. Comments on these issues are due by May 28. USTR is also holding a hearing May 15 in Washington, D.C.
Tim Triplett
Read more from Tim TriplettLatest in Trade Cases
Leibowitz: Trump takes aim at trade with a tariff ‘punt gun’
The tariffs are intended to produce more investment and jobs in US manufacturing. But first, there will be a cosmic change, potentially wiping out millions of jobs in the short run. While administration officials will no doubt cringe at the comparison, it reminds me of the effort to undercut fossil fuels production to address climate change. Led by Democrats, the effort was to destroy fossil fuels so that renewable energy sources would have more space to grow. The result: inflation and electoral defeat in 2024.
Price: Expect new trade shocks as Trump’s ‘reciprocal’ tariff negotiations continue
President Trump cast a wide net with the proposed, reciprocal tariffs. The negotiating stage will be critical to determining the success of his strategy. And for those suffering tariff whiplash, don’t expect the pace of change to slow down just because the reciprocal tariffs are entering a negotiating phase.
SMU Survey: Less support seen for Trump tariff policies
Meanwhile, an increasing number think it's too early to say whether the penalties are going to bring more manufacturing to the US.
CRU: USW seeks exclusion for Canada from Trump’s tariffs
The union is also urging stronger enforcement against countries such as China which break trade rules, and a coordinated Canada-US strategy to protect union jobs across the North America
Price on trade: A lot happened last week – and it wasn’t all about tariffs
Should foreign investment be allowed to reshape the American steel Industry? Not to be lost in the recent on-again-off-again tariff frenzy, Nippon Steel’s proposed takeover of U.S. Steel has also found itself in President Trump’s crosshairs when it comes to trade and industrial policy. Nippon Steel initially announced its nearly $15-billion bid for U.S. Steel […]