Trade Cases
Leibowitz on Trade: More China Tariffs Coming
Written by Sandy Williams
August 3, 2019
Trade attorney and Steel Market Update contributor Lewis Leibowitz offers the following update on events in Washington:
On Wednesday, President Trump tweeted that new tariffs would be imposed on U.S. imports from China, an escalation of the trade war that was launched in July 2018. The new tariffs, on most of the products not already covered by tariffs on China, will cover approximately $300 billion in imports. The initial rate will be 10 percent of value.
The stock market reacted adversely to the news. On Sunday, the president’s trade advisor, Peter Navarro, repeated the claim he has made many times before, joined by the president but very few others, that the Chinese are paying the tariffs rather than American importers and consumers. This has become a sterile argument, because the administration insists that the Chinese are suffering from the tariffs through reduced prices and sales volume. However, there is no doubt that U.S. importers pay the tariffs in the first instance. Any claim that the ultimate burden is borne by someone other than the person who pays them, it seems to me, has the burden of proving how the initial payment is recompensed by the person who paid it. Check out Mr. Navarro’s interview on Fox News Sunday this morning.
There is still no USTR notice about the tariffs as of today, and none is expected to be published tomorrow. If the full range of the $300 billion in goods is covered by the tariffs, these tariffs will hit consumer electronics, apparel and footwear, educational products and many others.
Earlier this year, the administration announced increased tariffs on “List 3” products from 10 percent to 25 percent. Initially, the tariffs were due to take effect on U.S. imports on or after June 1, but later the USTR’s office announced that products would not be affected if they were shipped from China before June 1. We don’t know for sure whether the Sept. 1 date applies to exports from China or U.S. imports. Typically, shipment from China takes three to four weeks to reach the United States.
We also do not know whether the new list (known widely as “List 4) will have an exclusion procedure. The USTR notice will either establish one or leave the issue open for the future. When the List 3 tariffs were increased to 25 percent, USTR announced an exclusion procedure. Because this list is subject to 10 percent tariffs (characterized by the president as “small”) we cannot be certain whether an exclusion procedure will be introduced for List 4.
Integrated Mills vs. Minimills
Last week, I reported on financial results of two major minimills and two integrated producers after 1½ years of tariff protection. The minimills are clearly doing better, based on the numbers.
On Aug. 1, ArcelorMittal, the largest steel producer in the world, reported its second-quarter and six-month results for 2019. As I noted last week, Arcelor does not report financial results for the U.S. affiliate, ArcelorMittal USA. However, the Aug. 1 report gave a glimpse into the U.S. operations: (1) U.S. earnings before taxes and depreciation (“EBITDA”) in the second quarter were down from the first quarter; and (2) because market conditions were unfavorable, AM USA took a $600 million write-down of its fixed asset values.
The asset value reduction was necessary because the “cash flow performance” in the first half of 2019 and the forecast for the remainder of the year “were below original expectations” because of “a steep decrease in steel prices in the presence of rising raw material cost.”
Since ArcelorMittal is the largest integrated steel producer in the U.S., this forecast is worth noting. It is yet another indication that the fortunes of the integrated sector of the steel industry under the Trump tariff regime are lagging behind those of the minimill sector.
Last week, I incorrectly referred to the Homestead Works, once owned by U.S. Steel, as the object of a major U.S. Steel renovation. I was called on this; thanks for the correction. U.S. Steel announced a major upgrade of the Edgar Thomson facility at its Mon Valley works. I don’t think the error changes the story. I appreciate the feedback.
Lewis Leibowitz
The Law Office of Lewis E. Leibowitz
1400 16th Street, N.W.
Suite 350
Washington, D.C. 20036
Phone: (202) 776-1142
Fax: (202) 861-2924
Cell: (202) 250-1551
Sandy Williams
Read more from Sandy WilliamsLatest in Trade Cases
Price on Trade: The foolishness of free trade with controlled economies
It was only a matter of time before a shutdown happened. And, no, we aren’t talking about the federal government’s lapse in appropriations. On Oct. 9, Beijing announced a series of restrictions that will effectively shut down exports of rare earth elements, magnets, and certain downstream products vital to advanced manufacturing.
Trump pulls plug on trade talks with Canada after anti-tariff Reagan ad
US President Donald Trump took to social media late Thursday night to announce he was canceling trade talks with Canada.
Leibowitz: Renewed trade war with China over rare earths
On Oct.10, President Trump announced major increases in tariffs on Chinese goods. The trigger was a new regime of export controls on rare earth metals and products using those elements, including magnets, capital equipment, and catalysts for catalytic converters in cars and trucks.
Industry piles on new Section 232 steel derivative inclusion requests
The Department of Commerce received 97 submissions from producers, manufacturers, and groups seeking Section 232 tariff coverage for steel and aluminum derivative products.
Price on Trade: New EU steel tariffs don’t mean the US should weaken its stance
Any steel imports into the EU that exceed the new, lower quota level would be subject to a 50% tariff, which represents a major increase from the EU’s current 25% out-of-quota tariff. This move would largely align the EU’s steel tariff rate with Canada and the United States.