• Skip to main content

    Government/Policy

    China Steel Rack Imports Assigned AD/CVD Duties

    Written by Sandy Williams


    The U.S. International Trade Commission determined on Tuesday that unfair imports of steel racks from China are causing material injury to domestic producers and should be subject to duties. The final decision follows the Department of Commerce AD/CVD determination that the racks are subsidized and sold in the U.S. at less than fair value.

    As a result of the USITC affirmative determination, Commerce will issue antidumping and countervailing duty orders on the products. Dumping rates determined by Commerce last month ranged from 18.06 percent to 144.50 percent. A subsidy rate of 1.50 percent was assigned to China’s Nanjing Dongsheng Shelf Manufacturing Co., a rate of 102.23 percent for 16 companies that failed to respond to Commerce’s request for information, and a rate of 1.50 percent for all other Chinese producers and exporters. The rates will be in effect for five years until they are reviewed for renewal.

    Latest in Government/Policy

    Join SMU on Tuesday for a Community Chat with SMA President Philip K. Bell

    Philip K. Bell, president of the Steel Manufacturers Association (SMA), will join SMU for a Community Chat on Tuesday, Nov. 17. The live webinar is free for anyone to attend. The recording and slide decks will be available only to SMU subscribers. Bell is plugged into steel and plugged into DC politics, which makes this chat a must-see, especially as we prepare for a new, Democratic-controlled Congress to convene in January.

    Price: Blue wave may rock tariff boat, but some ships like Section 232 aren’t sinking

    The midterms are over, and Democrats will control both chambers of Congress in January. In this space last week, Lewis Leibowitz predicted that President Trump's tariffs, including Section 232, may not last much longer. We disagree. To be sure, the new Congress will change trade policy. It will hold hearings, write bills, and almost certainly revisit the trade dispute with Canada. But the foundation of US trade policy is unlikely to be disturbed. Section 232 and Section 301 are established, court-tested authorities that both parties have used. They are also working.