Trade Cases
Leibowitz on Trade: China Trade War Escalates—U.S. Interests Express Dismay
Written by Tim Triplett
August 25, 2019
Trade attorney and Steel Market Update contributor Lewis Leibowitz offers the following update on events in Washington:
On Friday, China announced new tariffs in response to the Trump administration’s new tariffs on $300 billion of imports from China. Effective Sept. 1, China will impose 5 percent or 10 percent tariffs on more than 5,000 tariff lines. The tariffs affect a wide variety of goods. On Dec. 15, the delayed effective date for new U.S. tariffs on imports from China, the Chinese retaliation will principally affect U.S. autos and auto parts imports. China is an important export market for the U.S. auto industry, a signal of the increasing Chinese auto market, which has surpassed the U.S. as the world’s largest. The new China tariffs affect about $75 billion in U.S. exports to China.
Almost immediately a Twitter flurry ensued. The president announced, in response to the Chinese government’s move, that tariff on Chinese imports would increase by 5 percent. For goods on Lists One, Two and Three, tariffs will increase to 30 percent, effective Oct. 1. For goods on List Four, the 10 percent tariffs announced earlier this month will rise to 15 percent, effective Sept. 1 and Dec. 15.
Business groups immediately lamented the escalation. Agriculture will be hit hard again by the escalation, as Chinese tariffs on U.S. farm goods will escalate. John Deere, the agricultural equipment manufacturer (and major steel user) has announced that the tariff war has sharply reduced its profitability. Interestingly, as chronicled by columnist George Will today, one of the bright spots for Deere is increased export orders from Brazil and Argentina, both of whom compete with the U.S. for farm sales to China. The auto industry will be big losers from the retaliatory tariffs as well.
There is a disturbing echo of the First World War in these exchanges of fire, in which advances are literally non-existent. “The tit-for-tat tariffs, absent any meaningful negotiations, are damaging to the American auto industry,” President and CEO of Global Automakers John Bozzella said on Friday. Many other industries are aware of this reality.
If we are in a war, we must develop a winning strategy before the public’s patience for the war is exhausted. I believe we are in that stage now. To be sure, China’s practices have raised legitimate concerns in the United States and other countries. Now, the people of Hong Kong may be casualties in the trade war. With no “meaningful negotiations” in prospect, the leverage of the U.S. to affect China’s behavior in Hong Kong, intellectual property rights, foreign investment and other issues is diminished.
If tariffs were going to be successful in resolving these and other issues, there should be some results already. Essentially, there have been no results, only suspensions and postponements of tariffs that are now being imposed. If this is sacrifice without purpose, it cannot and should not endure.
One thing that has not been tried with China is international cooperation. Our staunchest allies, including Europe and Japan, have also been punished by the U.S. with tariffs on steel and aluminum. If China is our top priority, perhaps it is time for the U.S. to ask for help from those in a position to do so. Removing the steel and aluminum tariffs on our allies would be a remarkably good first step toward obtaining the assistance we need.
Lewis Leibowitz
The Law Office of Lewis E. Leibowitz
1400 16th Street, N.W.
Suite 350
Washington, D.C. 20036
Phone: (202) 776-1142
Fax: (202) 861-2924
Cell: (202) 250-1551
Tim Triplett
Read more from Tim TriplettLatest in Trade Cases
China challenges Canada’s tariffs on steel, aluminum, EVs
China is challenging Canada’s decision to put tariffs on imports of Chinese steel, aluminum, and electric vehicles.
Leibowitz: Harris, Trump don’t talk much about steel and trade – because they (mostly) agree
By most accounts, the issues that are most important for voters in this election are the economy, immigration, and abortion. International trade policy plays a key role in at least two of those three (the economy and immigration). Both presidential candidates recognize that trade and tariffs are an important focus. And “America first” is a rallying point for both candidates.
Commerce launches investigation into imports of coated flat-rolled steel
On Thursday, the Department of Commerce announced it would initiate investigations into coated steel imports from ten countries.
Op-Ed: Despite misclassification games, import data supports surge of Mexican conduit
Barry Zekelman, chairman and CEO of Zekelman Industries, says the import data unquestionably supports the fact that imports of Mexican conduit have been surging into the US market.
Leibowitz: The Mexican steel import “surge”—and what to do about it
US presidential campaigns frequently sport an “air of unreality.” No more so than the 2024 campaign, where superlatives fly around like mosquitos. Steel trade has been a feature of political discourse for at least half a century now. Just last week, it proceeded to a new level of “unreality.” Four senators - Bob Casey (D-Pa.), Sherrod Brown (D-Ohio), Marco Rubio (R-Fla.), and Mike Braun (R-Ind.) - wrote a “bipartisan” letter attacking Mexican exports of steel to the United States. They framed it as a “surge” in US steel imports from Mexico. To address this “surge,” the Senators urge the imposition of 25% tariffs on all steel imports from Mexico.