Final Thoughts

Final Thoughts
Written by Michael Cowden
February 10, 2022
On the price front, we’re below $1,200 per ton ($60 per cwt) for hot-rolled coil the first time in almost exactly a year, which had me going back and checking some of the headlines we had a year ago.
A recurring theme is that just about everything that happened last year is happening in reverse now.
Take the weather: A cold snap in Texas last year caused the electricity grid to fail, resulting in widespread outages and soaring prices? (Remember “Snowmageddon.”) This year, a cold snap in Texas resulted in… not much.
Or consider outages. A year ago, the approximately three-month outage coming up at Cleveland-Cliffs Inc.’s No. 5 blast furnace would have caused an absolute frenzy.
Recall how closely the strike at Allegheny Technologies Inc. was watched because even the tons toll rolled at ATI’s Brackenridge, Pa., hot rolling and processing facility made a difference.
This year, the reaction to even an 80-90 day outage is more “meh” than “ahh!”
Why? For one, lead times for hot-rolled coil last February were approaching eight weeks – or roughly double their historic norms, according to SMU’s interactive price tool. The question was how much more extended they could get. This year, a three-week lead time from a domestic mill is not uncommon. And the question is when lead times might start extending again.
“Last year the fear was of mills not delivering on time and of being cut off,” one service center executive told me. “This year, it wouldn’t be so terrible if a mill said, ‘Let’s take a one-month holiday.’”
And then there is the matter of prices. I hesitated to even put that $1,200 per ton figure in writing. Because prices are falling so fast, that it might look antiquated by the time this article posts. And that’s no exaggeration.
I’ve talked to buyers who were offered steel on Monday at more than $1,200 per ton. And then CRU (our parent company) posted a nearly $150-per-ton week-over-week decline on Wednesday. Did those buyers get offered a discount to match the CRU’s big drop? No. But were they offered a price that was more than $50 per ton below what had been offered a few days earlier? Yes.
And keep in mind that it’s the marginal tons and marginal prices that tend to drive things both on the way up and on the way down. I’ve heard of cases where imported slabs rolled on a domestic hot strip mill on a March lead time are available for around $1,000 per ton.
Also, and as I’ve noted before, prices for large tonnages for delivery well beyond current lead times can be even lower. Are orders for 10,000 or more tons for less than $1,000 per ton for Q2/Q3 delivery a repeatable spot deal? No. But is that number out there? Yes.
I personally thought that mills would be digging their heels in around $1,200 per ton to try to slow the pace of declines – by idling capacity, taking outages or announcing price hikes. But that doesn’t seem to be happening. Not yet anyway.
That said, perhaps the sooner we get to a sustainable price, the better. Demand – according to our channel checks – is still good. Which means people are not on the sidelines because they’re not moving steel. It’s Steel Buying 101: They just want to wait until the dust settles before they go back in and commit.
“The pricing over the last year was absolutely unnatural,” a second service center exec said. “The sooner we can get to replace inventory at a price that is sustainable, the better.”
So that might be the silver lining to this correction. It might be sharp but swift. Contrast that to 2015, when prices dripped steadily lower all year. As several contacts noted, a one-time hit is preferrable to that death by a thousand cuts.
And while new capacity gets blamed for lower prices, let’s also remember that it might help to create a more sustainable environment for the North American steel industry over the long term.
A competitive price from new and efficient local mills would be good for manufacturers, good for demand – and good for more reliable and durable domestic supply chains.
By Michael Cowden, Michael@SteelMarketUpdate.com

Michael Cowden
Read more from Michael CowdenLatest in Final Thoughts

Final Thoughts
We just wrapped another Steel 101 Workshop, where you take what you learned in the classroom into the steel mill.

Final Thoughts
Steel equities and steel futures fell hard after news broke earlier this week that the US and Mexico might reach an agreement that would result in the 50% Section 232 tariff coming off Mexican steel. The sharp declines didn’t make much sense, especially if, as some reports indicate, Mexico might agree to a fixed quota. They didn't make sense even if steel flows between the US and Mexico remain unchanged.

Final Thoughts
Even before the news about Mexico, I didn’t want to overstate the magnitude of the change in momentum. As far as we could tell, there hadn’t been a frenzy of new ordering following President Trump’s announcement of 50% Section 232 tariffs. But higher tariffs had unquestionably raised prices for imports, which typically provide the floor for domestic pricing. We’d heard, for example, that prices below $800 per short ton for hot-rolled (HR) coil were gone from the domestic market – even for larger buyers.

Final Thoughts
I want to draw your attention to SMU’s monthly scrap market survey. It’s a premium feature that complements our long-running steel market survey. We’ve been running our scrap survey since late January. And over just that short time, it’s become a valuable way not only for us to assess where scrap prices might go but also to quantify some of the “fuzzy” indicators - like sentiment and flows - that help to put the price in context.

Final Thoughts
I think there is an obvious case for sheet and plate prices going higher from here. That’s because, on a very basic level, the floor for flat-rolled steel prices, which is typically provided by imports, is now significantly higher than it was a week ago.