Steel Mills

A Contract Pendulum Swing Could Impact Mill Order Books
Written by John Packard
October 13, 2013
The following is an email we received from a service center executive regarding the current contract negotiations and their opinion as to how changes can change the mix of contracts to spot orders on with a mill and, price volatility in the marketplace. We have heard the same argument from others within the steel industry who believe the changes being requested by the domestic steel mills will create more volatility in the spot markets.
The pendulum has moved back and forth over the years, with the mills sometimes having majority contracts/lower spot books to sometimes having majority spot books/lower contracts. While the mills may be convinced (wrongly I believe) that the Index based pricing has been detrimental to their bottom lines, there likely were many benefits that came about as a result of the index model:
The market moved into one of the most stable periods in recent times. Efficiencies increased, predictive volumes allowed mills to plan and execute production better, mill on-time deliveries improved dramatically, end-users and service centers were able to reduce inventories since they were buying regular amounts each month. The need/want to take on speculative physical volumes to protect against a wild move up in price shrank away. As a result, volatility reduced significantly, and pricing became more stable – relative to the recent past.
And to the mills’ point that the Index-based model is negative for their bottom lines, mills (especially EAF producers) are making very good returns right now – with the Index-model very much still in place. Why is that? Oh, because fundamentals always dictate price: demand is steady, inventories are low, production was lost due to outages, and imports were relatively low. So, supply went down, demand held steady, and presto! Prices rose!
If the pendulum swings back to mills having majority Spot order books, they still won’t be able to control the price, but we will likely see a return to higher volatility, with bigger moves up and down, lost efficiencies, etc.
Steel Market Update welcomes your thoughts on the subject. You can email them to: John@SteelMarketUpdate.com

John Packard
Read more from John PackardLatest in Steel Mills

Atlas completes Evraz NA deal, renames firm, and hires former USS exec as CEO
Atlas Holdings has completed its acquisition of Evraz North America (Evraz NA) and its subsidiaries.

ArcelorMittal: As tariffs slow global growth, Calvert could be a bright spot
ArcelorMittal expects less demand growth across most of the markets it operates in, including the US, because of President Donald Trump’s tariffs. But the Luxembourg-based steelmaker also thinks it stands to benefit from an increasingly regionalized world thanks to investments like the new EAF at its mill in Calvert, Ala.

Ternium posts solid Q2, expects further shipment growth
Latin American steel producer Ternium delivered a solid performance in the second quarter of 2025. Performance was driven primarily by higher realized steel prices in Mexico, even as shipment volumes declined slightly across its regional portfolio.

Algoma swings to loss on ‘unprecedented disruptions’ and trade barriers
Canada’s Algoma Steel saw a sharp loss in the second quarter amid a continued challenging market environment and “tariff uncertainties.”

Nucor eyes long-term gains amid strong demand and trade enforcement
Resilient demand across its steel product lines, combined with the continued ramp-up of key expansion projects, drove Nucor’s improved financial results and record-setting performance in the second quarter. That’s according to company executives speaking on an earnings conference call on Tuesday.