Trade Cases

China Sees Protectionism Leading to Trade Wars
Written by Sandy Williams
February 5, 2017
Following the DOC determination of AD/CVD duties on imports of stainless steel products, China issued a statement expressing its disappointment that the United States continues to follow its path of protectionism.
“China is disappointed that the United States continued to launch high taxes on Chinese steel export products and calls into question the unfair way the US conducted its investigation,” said Wang Hejun, head of the trade remedy and investigation bureau of the Ministry of Commerce, on Saturday.
According to Wang the Department of Commerce disregarded evidence and cooperation provided by Chinese steel companies.
“The US has violated World Trade Organization rules by neglecting the abundant proof offered by Chinese companies and has treated them unfairly simply because of their state-owned-enterprise status,” said Wang.
Wang said the root of current challenges facing the steel sector is the sluggish world economy and shrinking demand, which calls for global cooperation instead of protectionism. He added that protectionism will hurt not only exporting countries but also U.S. consumer and downstream industries.
China’s President Xi Jinping told the World Economic Forum at Davos that globalization, free trade, and cooperation between nations should be encouraged, adding that protectionism would lead to trade wars.
“Pursuing protectionism is like locking oneself in a dark room. While wind and rain may be kept outside, that dark room will also block light and air,” he said. “No one will emerge as a winner in a trade war.”
U.S. trade policy under President Trump is one of “American First” and “American Made.”
“From this day forward, it’s going to be only America first, America first. Every decision on trade, on taxes, on immigration, on foreign affairs will be made to benefit American workers and American families,” he announced during his inaugural address. “We will follow two simple rules: Buy American and hire American.”
Trump has vowed proactive, stringent enforcement of trade remedies as well as naming China a currency manipulator. Many in the steel industry are supporters of this approach while other manufacturers, especially those who are dependent on imports and exports, are not as sure.
In a commentary in Fortune, Bill George, a senior fellow at Harvard Business School, writes, “The greater concern—if there are indeed trade wars—is the loss of international revenues and the jobs they have created. The Commerce Department reports that in 2014, U.S. trade with the countries in the now-cancelled Trans-Pacific Partnership created 15.6 million American jobs, and an additional 6.9 million with the European Union. Exports to Mexico and Canada in 2015 accounted for 2.2 million jobs—a number that has grown during the last five years. Collectively, the number of jobs created by exports exceeds the 7.5 million Americans who are unemployed.”
George writes that U.S. leadership in global trade has allowed the nation to set the rules governing trading transactions.
Writes George, “If the U.S. steps aside, it will enable China to aggressively fill this vacuum, setting its own rules. If this occurs, America’s global companies and their employees will be the biggest losers, ceding leadership of their industries to emerging Asian and European companies.”

Sandy Williams
Read more from Sandy WilliamsLatest in Trade Cases

US and China delay reciprocal tariffs, Section 232 tariffs stand
US President Donald Trump extended the US and China’s 90-day pause on planned reciprocal tariffs on Monday.

Price on Trade: 40% Brazil tariffs, Section 232 copper program, and misplaced carbon claims
The administration continues to negotiate deals with US trading partners, and the reciprocal tariff program appears poised for further modification. This week, we focus on other important developments that may have received less media attention.

Leibowitz on trade: Trump’s reciprocal tariffs face mounting legal challenges
The tariffs amount to a wholesale transformation of US trade policy from one promoting increasing international interaction to one of restricting trade to serve national strategic goals.

Steel groups voice different takes on US-EU trade deal
US and European steel trade groups were at odds over their reaction to the recent trade deal President Trump brokered with the EU.

Here’s what’s up next in the big coated steel trade case
Attorneys representing domestic petitioners and foreign respondent companies have been busy filing case briefings and making rebuttals as the corrosion-resistant steel unfair trade investigations begin to wind down.