Trade Cases
China Minister Comments on US and EU Trade Cases
Written by Sandy Williams
May 10, 2017
China’s Ministry of Commerce called the initiation by the U.S. of antidumping investigations on imports of cold-drawn steel mechanical tubing from China and five other countries “excessive,” in comments made on Thursday.
Wang Hejun, head of the trade remedy and investigation bureau, said he was concerned over rising protectionism from the United States.
“Under excessive protective policies, U.S. steel plants lack the motivation to make adjustments and are losing their global competitiveness. Trade partners will be harmed, and problems in the U.S. steel sector will still remain,” said Wang.
Wang said the frequent trade remedies and restrictions from the U.S. have caught the attention of the World Trade Organization. The United States should use caution and fairness in evaluating its trade case and create a stable and predictable environment for international cooperation in the steel sector, said Wang.
Wang also took issue with the final subsidy decision by the EU on imports of hot rolled coil to the region from China.
In a statement on the Ministry of Commerce site Wang said, “China strongly doubts the legitimacy of the decision of European Commission. China’s commercial banks coordinated with the EU’s investigation to the uttermost degree in this case, but the EU still ignores the fact of its independent market operation, affirming state-owned commercial banks as the ‘public organization’ and the loan provided to enterprises as the concessional loan. The EU even ignores the basic financial fact, regarding bank loan obtained by some state-owned enterprises as bestowment, creating high subsidy range deliberately, severely damaging the rights of the Chinese enterprises in this case.”
Wang urged the EU to conduct its investigation according to WTO rules and “amend its unreasonable adjudication as soon as possible.”
According to the State Council, China steel capacity has been reduced by 31.7 million tonnes to date, about 63.4 percent of its annual target.
Sandy Williams
Read more from Sandy WilliamsLatest in Trade Cases
Leibowitz: With ‘reciprocal’ tariffs struck down again in court, what happens next?
President Trump’s “reciprocal” tariffs under the International Emergency Economic Policy Act (IEEPA) were struck down again, this time on Aug. 29 by the Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit (CAFC). The legal and policy mess continues, with the next stop being the US Supreme Court.
Market unfazed by US circuit court’s IEEPA decision
Repealing any reciprocal tariffs placed by President Donald Trump on US imports of direct reduced iron (DRI), iron ore, hot-briquetted iron (HBI), and pig iron would have only a nominal impact on the US steel market, market participants said.
ITC votes to keep HR duties after sunset review
The US government determined this week that hot-rolled steel imports from a handful of countries continue to threaten the domestic steel industry.
Steel Summit: Zekelman advocates for ‘Fortress North America’
Barry Zekelman has a unique vantage point from which to view today’s trade landscape. A Canadian national who owns operations in both the US and Canada, he has also had dialogue with both Canadian and American administrations.
Steel Summit: Execs urge clarity on trade/tariff policy, want stronger USMCA
Tariff policy dominated the discussion of the SMU Steel Summit trade panel on Tuesday afternoon. The message was clear: uncertainty is rattling the steel supply chain.