Trade Cases
Trump, Ross Support Section 232 Relief for Steel
Written by John Packard
June 8, 2017
Commerce Secretary Wilbur Ross is leaning towards a Section 232 finding that national security is threatened by steel imports. On Thursday, he told a Senate Appropriations subcommittee that he believes there is “a genuine national security issue that must be considered in this case.”
Results of the Section 232 investigation are expected by the end of this month, but the administration seems to be moving even quicker toward a resolution. Ross’ comments, as well as comments by President Trump during his speech in Cincinnati on Wednesday, imply that an announcement benefiting the steel industry is forthcoming.
“Wait until you see what I am going to do for steel and your steel companies,” Trump said in his Ohio speech. “We are going to stop the dumping and stop all of these wonderful other countries from coming in and killing our companies and our workers. You will be seeing that very soon. The steel folks are going to be very happy.”
The private event held on the banks of the Ohio River was attended by steel industry leaders including Ohio-based AK Steel. Trump noted that removing burdensome regulations from businesses appeared to be even more welcomed than tax cuts. After acknowledging the love coming from the coal industry, Trump said steelworkers and oil workers will also be happy with what they see from his administration. “We’ve taken those restrictions and horrible regulations off your companies,” he said. We’re going to have clean, beautiful air and clean, beautiful, crystal clear water, but you can have your jobs also—maybe more than ever before.”
If an affirmative decision is made in the Section 232 investigation, Ross said, three kinds of action could be recommended: tariffs above and beyond the current AD/CVD country-specific duties; quotas limiting the volume of imports; and a hybrid “tariff-rate quota” for specific products with tariffs on volumes that exceed the maximum allowed.
“The overall impact on inflation, were that to be the route, should be relatively modest,” Ross said. “So, we’re very mindful of the need both to protect the domestic steel producers from inappropriate behavior on the part of foreign dumpers, but also to protect the steel consumers, the steel fabricators, the auto companies and everybody else who uses steel.”
Lewis Leibowitz, a Washington trade attorney, believes the administration favors the tariff-rate quota approach, which would have the least impact on inflation and the cost to steel users. “Importers are very apprehensive that any announcement could catch shipments ‘on the water’ that can’t be diverted. That could drive importers out of business as customers cancel orders. The TRQ would at least defer the ‘bite’ of the remedies until after the shipments in transit have arrived,” he said.
John Packard
Read more from John PackardLatest in Trade Cases
US and Canada expect positive outcomes from tariff negotiations
Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney and US President Donald Trump told reporters at the White House on Tuesday that they’ll be formulating a trade deal that works for both nations.
Leibowitz: When the shutdown should end
There is no doubt that the current government shutdown reflects the vast divisions between the extremes of American politics, society, and even geography. Almost all Americans agree that government is necessary, but voters disagree...
Price: The U.S. Steel shutdown that wasn’t and a call to stop ‘valuation cheating’
How can the U.S. government block U.S. Steel’s Granite City rolling mill closure without harming other American steelmakers? Reducing imports should be the first step. Foreign producers continue to aggressively target the U.S. market, especially now as they find themselves displaced by Chinese exports.
US steel industry applauds ITC final determination in coated trade case
Domestic mills praised the US International Trade Commission’s (ITC's) final determination that imports of corrosion-resistant (CORE) steel from 10 countries pose a threat to them.
ITC’s final ruling: Dumped, subsidized CORE imports are harming domestic market
The US International Trade Commission (ITC) finds that corrosion resistant steel (CORE) imports from 10 countries have caused material damage to domestic product producers, according to the ITC’s statement.