Trade Cases

The Section 232 Yo-Yo from Mill and Trader Perspectives
Written by John Packard
July 30, 2017
Steel Market Update (SMU) spoke with steel trading companies and steel mills late last week in order to gauge the “mood” of the steel suppliers. We found a mostly composed group who are looking at business for the long term (although their customers may be more fickle depending on the news of the day).
A trader told us, “On the import side, HR is the strongest product, and there has been some yo-yoing on pricing. Some items and some regions are faring better than others – import pricing has been impacted by ‘mood’ associated with 232 perception.” He went on to say, “Some weeks the market believes 232 will be strong and they buy steel. Other weeks they perceive 232 weakness and then they sit on their hands and convince themselves the sky will fall… I wish ground rules were clearly established.”
SMU spoke with trading companies and found they were all being very cautious. We were told by more than one trader that their company was working closely with their regular customers and they continue to take new orders for foreign steel with the understanding that the two sides would work together should a 232 decision negatively impact that business.
One large trading company told SMU, “We have been trying to conduct our business with core customers and suppliers in a reasonable way. Section 232 doesn’t have much merit at the end of the day.”
Steel traders made a point of reminding us that business and prices in the rest of the world are rising. Prices in China and Europe are up. Some countries have voluntarily removed themselves from the market.
A trading company executive pointed out that there could be some tightness in HVAC and furnace pipe galvanized products. “The pipeline could be drier than they [end users] think it is.” He continued with, “Demand is still very strong and we have seen August tons burnt up in July.”
We heard from steel mill executives who believe their order books are good and there is no need to panic. We heard from the head of commercial for one mill who told us slowing down the Section 232 decision will not hurt them. “Our book is solid and I don’t expect this to have much effect. A decision is still coming and the import pipeline is not going to magically recharge overnight. In my opinion, the more time it takes to get to a final decision, the better the result. This is a complex issue and it should take a lot of time to get it right with minimum collateral damage/unintended consequences.” He continued (tongue-in-cheek?) with, “I figure they are delaying until your conference…”
Another mill said, “[Any push-out of a 232 decision] changes nothing about what we will do or are going to continue to do. As to what (customers) think, well, they think something has changed. Not sure how Trump saying what we have already been observing over the past month is actually news.”
A third mill told us, “Not too concerned. Bookings are steady, we’re moving into September lead times. We believe prime scrap could be up by $20 in the August buy (minimills running well; auto stamping plant scrap generation down). Ongoing and prolonged uncertainty on what shape Section 232 may take is good for domestic producers; it hangs over the offshore sourcing markets like an ominous thunder cloud. New trading activity will continue to be muted. The very serious import coil percentage growth of 1H 2017 (except for HR) will likely dissipate across the back half of the year.”
During their earnings call with analysts, U.S. Steel CEO David Burritt said this of 232: “We continue to monitor the progress of the Section 232 investigation. We believe we have a compelling case of the harm that imports our having on America’s economic and national security. In order to have a strong U.S. manufacturing base, we must have a strong steel industry. So goes our manufacturing base, so goes our country. We firmly believe that this administration understands the importance U.S. steel to this country. This is in the government’s hand; they understand what’s at stake; they know what needs to be done. And we are confident this administration will come to the right conclusion. When the president announces his actions under Section 232, we are prepared to respond quickly. We will make our assessment of the potential impact of the Section 232 actions taken, and then make the adjustments to our operations necessary to continue to support our customers and respond to new opportunities. Enough said about 232, but make no mistake about this. This country has been in a trade war for decades and it needs to end now.”

John Packard
Read more from John PackardLatest in Trade Cases

Price on Trade: IEEPA tariffs head to the Supreme Court, DOJ ramps up trade enforcement
International trade law and policy remain a hot topic in Washington and beyond this week. We are paying special attention to the ongoing litigation of the president’s tariff policies and the administration’s efforts to heighten trade enforcement.

Mexico considers stiff tariffs for steel, autos, and other imports
Mexico is considering imposing steep tariffs on imports of steel, automobiles, and over 1,400 other products. Its target? Countries with which it does not have free trade agreements, mainly China, India, Thailand, and other South Asian nations.

Leibowitz: With ‘reciprocal’ tariffs struck down again in court, what happens next?
President Trump’s “reciprocal” tariffs under the International Emergency Economic Policy Act (IEEPA) were struck down again, this time on Aug. 29 by the Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit (CAFC). The legal and policy mess continues, with the next stop being the US Supreme Court.

Market unfazed by US circuit court’s IEEPA decision
Repealing any reciprocal tariffs placed by President Donald Trump on US imports of direct reduced iron (DRI), iron ore, hot-briquetted iron (HBI), and pig iron would have only a nominal impact on the US steel market, market participants said.

ITC votes to keep HR duties after sunset review
The US government determined this week that hot-rolled steel imports from a handful of countries continue to threaten the domestic steel industry.