Trade Cases
Steel Forum Moving Toward Report on Excess Capacity
Written by Sandy Williams
September 12, 2017
G-20 members are on track to hold their first official meeting of the Global Steel Forum on Excess Steel Capacity this fall. The forum was formed last year during the 2016 meetings to find “collective solutions” to remedy steel overcapacity and discourage protectionism. The group met informally at the Summit in Hamburg in July 2017.
Members have been meeting at the working-group level compiling information for a comprehensive report on overcapacity, reported Inside U.S. Trade. At the Hamburg G-20 meeting, the forum was instructed to meet “commitments on enhancing information sharing and cooperation” by August and produce a “substantive” report with “concrete policy solutions” by November.
“Almost all the Global Forum members are now providing complete plant-level data on steel plants and relevant information on government policies and measures,” an Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development official told Inside U.S. Trade.
China and India, two of the largest contributors to excess capacity, have shown signs of “increasing agreement” on the issue, and members are optimistic that firm steps to address steel overcapacity will be offered in the November report.
The forum will convene Sept. 25-27 in Paris to begin drafting the November report. According to a forum official, members will discuss information that has been shared and “current practices that may be influencing steel capacity and market developments. Members will look at effective steps to reduce excess capacity with a view to developing concrete policy solutions.”
Another working level meeting is expected to be scheduled for late October or early November and a formal ministerial meeting in late November or early December.
The forum’s mission is set against the timetable for a potential barring of steel imports into the U.S. in a Section 232 action by the Trump administration. The Commerce Department has until Jan. 14 to submit recommendations to the president.
The U.S. steel industry has urged the administration to move forward on its decision in order to relieve uncertainty in the global steel sector. Opponents of the Section 232 action urge multilateral discussions to solve overcapacity and to ensure fair and open markets.
Sandy Williams
Read more from Sandy WilliamsLatest in Trade Cases
US and Canada expect positive outcomes from tariff negotiations
Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney and US President Donald Trump told reporters at the White House on Tuesday that they’ll be formulating a trade deal that works for both nations.
Leibowitz: When the shutdown should end
There is no doubt that the current government shutdown reflects the vast divisions between the extremes of American politics, society, and even geography. Almost all Americans agree that government is necessary, but voters disagree...
Price: The U.S. Steel shutdown that wasn’t and a call to stop ‘valuation cheating’
How can the U.S. government block U.S. Steel’s Granite City rolling mill closure without harming other American steelmakers? Reducing imports should be the first step. Foreign producers continue to aggressively target the U.S. market, especially now as they find themselves displaced by Chinese exports.
US steel industry applauds ITC final determination in coated trade case
Domestic mills praised the US International Trade Commission’s (ITC's) final determination that imports of corrosion-resistant (CORE) steel from 10 countries pose a threat to them.
ITC’s final ruling: Dumped, subsidized CORE imports are harming domestic market
The US International Trade Commission (ITC) finds that corrosion resistant steel (CORE) imports from 10 countries have caused material damage to domestic product producers, according to the ITC’s statement.