Trade Cases
Steel Forum Moving Toward Report on Excess Capacity
Written by Sandy Williams
September 12, 2017
G-20 members are on track to hold their first official meeting of the Global Steel Forum on Excess Steel Capacity this fall. The forum was formed last year during the 2016 meetings to find “collective solutions” to remedy steel overcapacity and discourage protectionism. The group met informally at the Summit in Hamburg in July 2017.
Members have been meeting at the working-group level compiling information for a comprehensive report on overcapacity, reported Inside U.S. Trade. At the Hamburg G-20 meeting, the forum was instructed to meet “commitments on enhancing information sharing and cooperation” by August and produce a “substantive” report with “concrete policy solutions” by November.
“Almost all the Global Forum members are now providing complete plant-level data on steel plants and relevant information on government policies and measures,” an Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development official told Inside U.S. Trade.
China and India, two of the largest contributors to excess capacity, have shown signs of “increasing agreement” on the issue, and members are optimistic that firm steps to address steel overcapacity will be offered in the November report.
The forum will convene Sept. 25-27 in Paris to begin drafting the November report. According to a forum official, members will discuss information that has been shared and “current practices that may be influencing steel capacity and market developments. Members will look at effective steps to reduce excess capacity with a view to developing concrete policy solutions.”
Another working level meeting is expected to be scheduled for late October or early November and a formal ministerial meeting in late November or early December.
The forum’s mission is set against the timetable for a potential barring of steel imports into the U.S. in a Section 232 action by the Trump administration. The Commerce Department has until Jan. 14 to submit recommendations to the president.
The U.S. steel industry has urged the administration to move forward on its decision in order to relieve uncertainty in the global steel sector. Opponents of the Section 232 action urge multilateral discussions to solve overcapacity and to ensure fair and open markets.
Sandy Williams
Read more from Sandy WilliamsLatest in Trade Cases
Price on Trade: IEEPA tariffs head to the Supreme Court, DOJ ramps up trade enforcement
International trade law and policy remain a hot topic in Washington and beyond this week. We are paying special attention to the ongoing litigation of the president’s tariff policies and the administration’s efforts to heighten trade enforcement.
Mexico considers stiff tariffs for steel, autos, and other imports
Mexico is considering imposing steep tariffs on imports of steel, automobiles, and over 1,400 other products. Its target? Countries with which it does not have free trade agreements, mainly China, India, Thailand, and other South Asian nations.
Leibowitz: With ‘reciprocal’ tariffs struck down again in court, what happens next?
President Trump’s “reciprocal” tariffs under the International Emergency Economic Policy Act (IEEPA) were struck down again, this time on Aug. 29 by the Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit (CAFC). The legal and policy mess continues, with the next stop being the US Supreme Court.
Market unfazed by US circuit court’s IEEPA decision
Repealing any reciprocal tariffs placed by President Donald Trump on US imports of direct reduced iron (DRI), iron ore, hot-briquetted iron (HBI), and pig iron would have only a nominal impact on the US steel market, market participants said.
ITC votes to keep HR duties after sunset review
The US government determined this week that hot-rolled steel imports from a handful of countries continue to threaten the domestic steel industry.