Trade Cases
Section 232 Meets Resistance from Defense Department
Written by Sandy Williams
December 9, 2017
The Section 232 investigation into steel imports fails to meet approval by the Defense Department, according to Inside U.S. Trade sources.
After reviewing a draft report earlier this year, the Defense Department determined that trade restrictions proposed by Commerce Secretary Wilbur Ross would “unnecessarily vex U.S. allies.”
A source told Inside U.S. Trade that the administration has “politically boxed themselves in” because the Defense Department will not allow Section 232 to proceed without significant exclusions for U.S. allies
It is reported that remedy exclusions are being considered for Australia, Mexico, Canada, the United Kingdom, Japan and South Korea. Allies such as Japan are counting on a 2016 memorandum of understanding that waives restrictions on import of equipment produced in Japan for use in U.S. military applications.
Section 232 was delayed while Congress concentrated on tax reform. With that issue coming to a conclusion, Ross is being urged by the House Steel caucus to conclude the steel import investigation.
Sources have given conflicting reports on how much data has been collected for the investigation and under what methods. Democratic senators from Illinois sent a letter to Ross on Nov. 28 urging the conclusion of the investigation and a more transparent review process in the interim.
“It is important that our domestic stakeholders are made aware of the timing and process of your report, as well as your conclusions and recommendations, in as timely a manner as possible,” wrote Illinois Senators Tammy Duckworth and Richard Durbin. “Additionally, any recommendation by your administration should make sure that both U.S. steel manufacturers and their downstream consumers are able to create American jobs and increase domestic production as a result of your investigation.”
Ross told Sen. Bob Casey (D-PA) in September that the Section 232 report would not be issued until after tax reform legislation was passed. When Inside U.S. Trade asked Casey last week if tax reform was the official administration line on why the probe was delayed, Casey responded, “The line keeps moving.”
Sandy Williams
Read more from Sandy WilliamsLatest in Trade Cases
US, UK reach trade deal that includes Section 232 ‘alternative’
The US and UK governments have announced a trade deal in which an “alternative” to the Section 232 steel and aluminum tariffs will be provided.
US pols urge ‘domestically owned’ steel industry
US Sen. Jim Banks (R-Ohio) and Rep. Frank Mrvan (D-Ind.) have written a letter in support of a “domestically owned and operated American steel industry” being vital to national security.
Leibowitz: Trump takes aim at trade with a tariff ‘punt gun’
The tariffs are intended to produce more investment and jobs in US manufacturing. But first, there will be a cosmic change, potentially wiping out millions of jobs in the short run. While administration officials will no doubt cringe at the comparison, it reminds me of the effort to undercut fossil fuels production to address climate change. Led by Democrats, the effort was to destroy fossil fuels so that renewable energy sources would have more space to grow. The result: inflation and electoral defeat in 2024.
Price: Expect new trade shocks as Trump’s ‘reciprocal’ tariff negotiations continue
President Trump cast a wide net with the proposed, reciprocal tariffs. The negotiating stage will be critical to determining the success of his strategy. And for those suffering tariff whiplash, don’t expect the pace of change to slow down just because the reciprocal tariffs are entering a negotiating phase.
SMU Survey: Less support seen for Trump tariff policies
Meanwhile, an increasing number think it's too early to say whether the penalties are going to bring more manufacturing to the US.