Trade Cases

Trump Uses Section 232 as Leverage in NAFTA Talks
Written by Sandy Williams
March 5, 2018
President Trump says there will be no tariff exclusions for Canada and Mexico unless a “new and fair NAFTA agreement is signed.” Translation: If you accede to our demands, we will exclude you from Section 232.
Trump tweeted early on Monday morning: “We have large trade deficits with Mexico and Canada. NAFTA, which is under renegotiation right now, has been a bad deal for U.S.A. Massive relocation of companies & jobs. Tariffs on Steel and Aluminum will only come off if new & fair NAFTA agreement is signed. Also, Canada must treat our farmers much better. Highly restrictive. Mexico must do much more on stopping drugs from pouring into the U.S. They have not done what needs to be done. Millions of people addicted and dying.”
Whether the threat will work to persuade Canada and Mexico to capitulate to U.S. demands is yet to be seen. The two nations have rebuked the U.S. for insisting on changes on rules of origin, procurement, and dispute settlement that clearly favor the United States rather than facilitating fair trade between the three trading partners. They are also expected to join with other nations in opposing the Section 232 tariffs at the World Trade Organization. So far, the Trump administration appears unimpressed and unworried.
Ildefonso Guarjardo, Mexico’s Secretary of Economy, tweeted back at Trump,“Mexico shouldn’t be included in steel & aluminum tariffs. It’s the wrong way to incentivize the creation of a new and modern NAFTA.”
A breakdown in procurement talks at NAFTA has prompted bilateral negotiations between Mexico and Canada. The U.S. has proposed a “dollar-for-dollar” approach that would combine Canadian and Mexican procurement against that of the U.S, a proposal that critics say is ludicrous because of the much larger size of the American market.
Canada and Mexico rebuffed the idea calling it a “non-starter.” Canada chief negotiator Steve Verheul said it was the “worst proposal that’s ever been made in history.”
Mexico put forward its own tongue-in-cheek proposal at the fifth round, suggesting a “peso-for dollar” requirement to illustrate the unfairness of the U.S. proposal.
Negotiators have made progress on some of the less contentious issues for the new agreement, closing five of the 30 topic areas.
“NAFTA negotiations are at a critical point where there are specific and very technical issues that are going to be elevated to a higher decision-making level, out of the negotiating table,” said attorney Carlos Vejar, a former negotiator for the Mexican Ministry of Economy, to Bloomberg. “Some of those issues will not be resolved until the very end of the negotiations, at the very last moment. Either you get the deal done, or you just can’t.”
As negotiators wrap up the seventh round of discussions on Monday, the Section 232 tariffs are expected to dominate the conversation.

Sandy Williams
Read more from Sandy WilliamsLatest in Trade Cases

Price on Trade: IEEPA tariffs head to the Supreme Court, DOJ ramps up trade enforcement
International trade law and policy remain a hot topic in Washington and beyond this week. We are paying special attention to the ongoing litigation of the president’s tariff policies and the administration’s efforts to heighten trade enforcement.

Mexico considers stiff tariffs for steel, autos, and other imports
Mexico is considering imposing steep tariffs on imports of steel, automobiles, and over 1,400 other products. Its target? Countries with which it does not have free trade agreements, mainly China, India, Thailand, and other South Asian nations.

Leibowitz: With ‘reciprocal’ tariffs struck down again in court, what happens next?
President Trump’s “reciprocal” tariffs under the International Emergency Economic Policy Act (IEEPA) were struck down again, this time on Aug. 29 by the Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit (CAFC). The legal and policy mess continues, with the next stop being the US Supreme Court.

Market unfazed by US circuit court’s IEEPA decision
Repealing any reciprocal tariffs placed by President Donald Trump on US imports of direct reduced iron (DRI), iron ore, hot-briquetted iron (HBI), and pig iron would have only a nominal impact on the US steel market, market participants said.

ITC votes to keep HR duties after sunset review
The US government determined this week that hot-rolled steel imports from a handful of countries continue to threaten the domestic steel industry.