Trade Cases
Brazil Considering Section 232 Concessions
Written by Sandy Williams
April 2, 2018
Brazil is one of seven countries granted a temporary retrieve from Section 232 tariffs on steel and aluminum. If the 25 percent tariff is imposed on the Brazilian steel industry, it would impact 13 percent of the nation’s steel exports and lead to losses estimated at $350 million annually, according to a new study by the Institute for Applied Economic Research. In 2017, Brazil exported approximately $2.6 billion of steel to the U.S., 33 percent of its total steel exports.
Last week, it was reported that U.S. negotiators proposed measures for Brazil to consider in return for permanent exemption from the tariffs. They included:
- Reduce tariff and quota limits on imports of ethanol. Currently, Brazil charges a 20 percent tariff on ethanol imports above 150 million metric tons per quarter. The tariff is designed to protect Brazilian farmers from foreign competition.
- Finalize the Open Skies deal. Open Skies is an agreement that would allow unlimited commercial flights between Brazil’s LATAM Airlines Group and U.S.-based American Airlines. The Brazilian Senate approved the agreement on March 7, sending it on to President Michel Temer for signature.
- Defend against Chinese circumvention. U.S. negotiators request that Brazil take measures to prevent China from circumventing the U.S. tariffs though shipments of steel and aluminum through Brazil’s borders.
In return, the United States said it will support Brazil’s effort to join the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development.
Sandy Williams
Read more from Sandy WilliamsLatest in Trade Cases
US pols urge ‘domestically owned’ steel industry
US Sen. Jim Banks (R-Ohio) and Rep. Frank Mrvan (D-Ind.) have written a letter in support of a “domestically owned and operated American steel industry” being vital to national security.
Leibowitz: Trump takes aim at trade with a tariff ‘punt gun’
The tariffs are intended to produce more investment and jobs in US manufacturing. But first, there will be a cosmic change, potentially wiping out millions of jobs in the short run. While administration officials will no doubt cringe at the comparison, it reminds me of the effort to undercut fossil fuels production to address climate change. Led by Democrats, the effort was to destroy fossil fuels so that renewable energy sources would have more space to grow. The result: inflation and electoral defeat in 2024.
Price: Expect new trade shocks as Trump’s ‘reciprocal’ tariff negotiations continue
President Trump cast a wide net with the proposed, reciprocal tariffs. The negotiating stage will be critical to determining the success of his strategy. And for those suffering tariff whiplash, don’t expect the pace of change to slow down just because the reciprocal tariffs are entering a negotiating phase.
SMU Survey: Less support seen for Trump tariff policies
Meanwhile, an increasing number think it's too early to say whether the penalties are going to bring more manufacturing to the US.
CRU: USW seeks exclusion for Canada from Trump’s tariffs
The union is also urging stronger enforcement against countries such as China which break trade rules, and a coordinated Canada-US strategy to protect union jobs across the North America