Trade Cases
Commerce Applies Duties on Vietnamese Steel Linked to China
Written by Tim Triplett
May 22, 2018
Marking a win for U.S. steelmakers, the Commerce Department on Monday officially slapped duties on corrosion-resistant steel (CORE) and certain cold rolled steel products imported from Vietnam that were produced from substrate originating in China. Commerce determined that even though the products underwent some processing in Vietnam, they should still be subject to the same antidumping and countervailing duty orders as if they had been exported directly from China.
Domestic steelmakers who filed the case argued China was seeking to circumvent U.S. duties by shipping steel through a third country, in this case Vietnam. Shipments of CORE from Vietnam to the United States increased from $2 million to $80 million after preliminary duties were imposed on Chinese products in 2015. Likewise, shipments of cold-rolled steel from Vietnam to the United States increased from $9 million to $215 million.
U.S. law provides that Commerce may find circumvention of AD/CVD orders when merchandise that is the same class or kind as merchandise subject to existing orders is completed or assembled in a third country prior to importation into the United States.
Customs and Border Protection will continue to collect AD and CVD cash deposits on imports of CORE produced in Vietnam using Chinese-origin substrate at antidumping rates of 199.43 percent and countervailing duty rates of 39.05 percent. CBP will also collect cash deposits on imports of cold-rolled steel produced in Vietnam using Chinese-origin substrate at antidumping rates of 199.76 percent and countervailing duty rates of 256.44 percent. These cash deposit rates were previously established in the AD and CVD investigations on cold-rolled steel and CORE from China. Cash deposits will apply to all unliquidated entries on or after Nov. 4, 2016, the date the inquiries were initiated, Commerce said.
Importers and exporters of Vietnamese merchandise that is produced from substrate originating in Vietnam or a third-country have the option of seeking an exemption from cash deposits by certifying that the substrate originated outside of China.
The trade case was originally filed by domestic producers Steel Dynamics, Inc., California Steel Industries, AK Steel Corp., ArcelorMittal USA, Nucor Corp. and United States Steel Corp.
The duties on CORE and cold rolled from Vietnam come in addition to a 25 percent tariff resulting from the Trump administration’s Section 232 national security investigation.
Tim Triplett
Read more from Tim TriplettLatest in Trade Cases
Leibowitz: With ‘reciprocal’ tariffs struck down again in court, what happens next?
President Trump’s “reciprocal” tariffs under the International Emergency Economic Policy Act (IEEPA) were struck down again, this time on Aug. 29 by the Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit (CAFC). The legal and policy mess continues, with the next stop being the US Supreme Court.
Market unfazed by US circuit court’s IEEPA decision
Repealing any reciprocal tariffs placed by President Donald Trump on US imports of direct reduced iron (DRI), iron ore, hot-briquetted iron (HBI), and pig iron would have only a nominal impact on the US steel market, market participants said.
ITC votes to keep HR duties after sunset review
The US government determined this week that hot-rolled steel imports from a handful of countries continue to threaten the domestic steel industry.
Steel Summit: Zekelman advocates for ‘Fortress North America’
Barry Zekelman has a unique vantage point from which to view today’s trade landscape. A Canadian national who owns operations in both the US and Canada, he has also had dialogue with both Canadian and American administrations.
Steel Summit: Execs urge clarity on trade/tariff policy, want stronger USMCA
Tariff policy dominated the discussion of the SMU Steel Summit trade panel on Tuesday afternoon. The message was clear: uncertainty is rattling the steel supply chain.