Trade Cases
Line Pipe Producers Refute Challenges to Section 232 Tariffs
Written by Sandy Williams
June 12, 2018
Speaking in support of the Section 232 tariffs, the American Line Pipe Producers Association is challenging recent claims by U.S. pipeline developers that they are unable to source sufficient quantities of large-diameter line pipe in the United States.
The large-diameter welded pipe industry in the U.S. is operating at its lowest capacity in years—well under 40 percent—and, if given the opportunity, is “ready, able and eager” to supply pipeline operators, says ALPPA.
“U.S. producers can make virtually everything demanded for American pipeline projects, and they do so using domestic steel,” said Tim Brightbill, trade counsel to ALPPA. “Complaints by industry groups such as the Interstate National Gas Association of America (INGAA) and the Association of Oil Pipe Lines (AOPL) are completely unfounded. There is no reason why U.S. pipeline projects should not be using U.S.-manufactured large-diameter line pipe.”
A second allegation ALPPA refutes is that pipeline projects will be put on hold due to the high cost of Section 232 tariffs. Pipeline costs have been exaggerated, said ALPPA. Although tariffs may increase the price of imported pipe, large-diameter welded pipe accounts for only 20 percent of the total pipeline project cost, and pipeline projects continue to be highly profitable.
ALPPA notes that pipeline operators continue to rely on imports despite the tariffs, resulting in lost bids for domestic producers and further injury from “dumped and subsidized imports” of large-diameter pipe.
The Trump administration is correct in concluding that imports of steel pipe threaten U.S. national security and critical infrastructure, says ALLPA, pointing to affirmative preliminary determinations by the U.S. International Trade Commission in antidumping and countervailing duty investigations on pipe imports from Canada, China, Greece, India, Korea and Turkey.
“ALPPA strongly opposes requests from pipeline operators to be excluded from the steel Section 232 tariffs,” said the association.
Sandy Williams
Read more from Sandy WilliamsLatest in Trade Cases
US and Canada expect positive outcomes from tariff negotiations
Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney and US President Donald Trump told reporters at the White House on Tuesday that they’ll be formulating a trade deal that works for both nations.
Leibowitz: When the shutdown should end
There is no doubt that the current government shutdown reflects the vast divisions between the extremes of American politics, society, and even geography. Almost all Americans agree that government is necessary, but voters disagree...
Price: The U.S. Steel shutdown that wasn’t and a call to stop ‘valuation cheating’
How can the U.S. government block U.S. Steel’s Granite City rolling mill closure without harming other American steelmakers? Reducing imports should be the first step. Foreign producers continue to aggressively target the U.S. market, especially now as they find themselves displaced by Chinese exports.
US steel industry applauds ITC final determination in coated trade case
Domestic mills praised the US International Trade Commission’s (ITC's) final determination that imports of corrosion-resistant (CORE) steel from 10 countries pose a threat to them.
ITC’s final ruling: Dumped, subsidized CORE imports are harming domestic market
The US International Trade Commission (ITC) finds that corrosion resistant steel (CORE) imports from 10 countries have caused material damage to domestic product producers, according to the ITC’s statement.