Trade Cases
AIIS: Steel Tariffs Have Begun to Take Effect
Written by Tim Triplett
June 28, 2018
Steel imports fell by nearly a quarter from April to May as the Trump administration’s steel tariffs began to take effect, reported the American Institute for International Steel (AIIS).
Imports fell 23.2 percent month-to-month to 2.89 million net tons, which was almost 16 percent lower than in May 2017. South Korea—which has agreed to a quota limiting its exports to the U.S.—recorded a decline of more than three-fourths from the preceding month and two-thirds from the previous May to 110,000 net tons. Imports from Russia fell by similar percentages to 114,000 net tons, and imports from Brazil decreased by more than a quarter from April and by nearly half from May of last year to 293,000 net tons. The European Union was exempted from the tariffs until June 1, and the 585,000 net tons of imports from that region showed growth of more than 22 percent on both a monthly and an annual basis. Canada and Mexico were also exempted until June 1, and while imports from Canada were largely unchanged from April at 710,000 net tons, imports from Mexico fell by 7 percent to 364,000 net tons. Both totals, though, were around one-fourth higher than in May 2017, in part because of strong growth from March to April in anticipation of the tariffs taking effect, AIIS said.
Through the first five months of the year, imports declined by 2.5 percent to 15.34 million net tons. Imports from Canada increased 16.8 percent to 3.15 million net tons and imports from the European Union grew by 12.7 percent to 2.2 million net tons, but imports from Brazil fell 12.3 percent to 1.8 million net tons. Imports from South Korea were largely unchanged at 1.53 million net tons, while imports from Mexico increased 18.4 percent to 1.7 million net tons.
“The administration will probably celebrate the May data, but businesses and consumers will not,” said AIIS President Richard Chriss. “Adding 25 percent to the cost of nearly every ton of steel that is brought into the country is a shortsighted tactic that will do long-term harm to the U.S. economy. That is why AIIS is going to court to challenge the tariffs and the faulty national security rationale that is being used to justify them. This administration may be unwilling to listen to economic arguments, but it will not be able to ignore legal ones.”
AIIS advocates for free trade on behalf of foreign producers, steel importers, exporters, distributors, consumers and related businesses.
Tim Triplett
Read more from Tim TriplettLatest in Trade Cases
Industry piles on new Section 232 steel derivative inclusion requests
The Department of Commerce received 97 submissions from producers, manufacturers, and groups seeking Section 232 tariff coverage for steel and aluminum derivative products.
Price on Trade: New EU steel tariffs don’t mean the US should weaken its stance
Any steel imports into the EU that exceed the new, lower quota level would be subject to a 50% tariff, which represents a major increase from the EU’s current 25% out-of-quota tariff. This move would largely align the EU’s steel tariff rate with Canada and the United States.
Global steel forum sets 2026 framework deadline as US ups pressure on excess capacity
Global steelmakers sounded the alarm Friday over the deepening excess steelmaking capacity crisis. Ministers at the Global Forum on Steel Excess Capacity (GFSEC) in Gqeberha, South Africa, pledged to...
CRU: China’s indirect steel exports find new destination markets
The boom in China’s direct steel exports has not stopped this year, even with a rise in protectionist measures globally. The increase is driven by...
U.S. Steel sues Algoma over iron pellet shipments
U.S. Steel is suing Algoma over the Canadian flat-rolled producer's rejection of iron pellet shipments, arguing it has breached its contract.