Trade Cases

The Tariff Exclusion Process: A Case Study in Frustration
Written by Tim Triplett
October 2, 2018
Priefert Manufacturing Co. is one of hundreds that have applied for exclusions from U.S tariffs on steel products they can’t source domestically. Priefert’s experience, much like so many others, is a case study in frustration.
Based in Mt. Pleasant, Texas, Priefert is both a service center and a manufacturer of ranching equipment. The company filed an exclusion request in April, which was rejected for missing information, and then resubmitted the claim in May. Five months later, after paying $470,000 in tariffs, Priefert is still awaiting a ruling from the Commerce Department.
One of the products Priefert makes calls for ultra-wide hot rolled steel sheet in a narrow gauge—A1011 CS/B hot rolled, 10 gauge (.130-.145) x 80-inch mill edge. It is used to manufacture the bed of a dump truck with fewer welds. The company seeks an annual exemption to import 26,000 tons tariff-free.
Priefert claims it has searched the market for a domestic mill that can provide the coil it needs, but none exist. So, it has developed a relationship with the HBIS Group Serbia Iron and Steel in Eastern Europe.
Nevertheless, two domestic mills filed objections to Priefert’s exclusion request. Upon further investigation, one withdrew its objection, but U.S. Steel continues to oppose Priefert’s filing, even though it admittedly does not offer the product Priefert needs.
In its objection, U.S. Steel noted that it formerly owned the Serbian mill that now supplies the product to Priefert. During that 10-year period of ownership, the mill did not sell to Priefert. “They clearly were able to survive and prosper in those 10 years” without imports from the Serbian mill, said U.S. Steel executives. (Priefert’s response: “The steel we need is for a new customer we didn’t have then.”)
U.S. Steel also claims at least four mills in the United States make hot rolled coil in the needed widths. (Priefert’s response: “Simply wrong. Our exclusion request is for a 10 gauge 80-inch-wide hot rolled carbon steel coil. None of the mills mentioned can produce the product in question to the specified width and gauge combination. We had pursued all of these sources with due diligence before making an exclusion request.)
U.S. Steel also disputed Priefert’s claim that it is unable to procure material at an affordable price, and that the Section 232 tariffs are the source of the high steel prices in the U.S. “In our opinion, that is the key issue, as the buyer has now lost the ability to purchase cheap steel from a mill owned by a Chinese company. It is worth noting that China has a very long and notorious history of dumping cheap, subsidized steel products into this country, and this request for exclusion is simply an attempt to continue to exploit a cheap, below market supply chain cost…,” U.S. Steel wrote in its objection. It also argued that domestic steel prices are a function of strong U.S. demand, not the tariffs. (Priefert’s response: “There are indeed many factors affecting rising steel prices, but to suggest the Section 232 actions undertaken are not responsible is simply ludicrous.”)
U.S. Steel also suggested Priefert’s filing represents a threat to national security. “We formally ask that the exclusion request made by Priefert Mfg. Co., Inc., not be granted, and that the national security concerns as outlined in the Department of Commerce report in early 2018 be followed, and ensure that American steel producers are able to increase capacity utilization rates to 80%.” (Priefert’s response: “We are outraged to be referred to in this slanderous manner…. If national security concerns are really in play then perhaps Congress should step in and require the ‘Big Steel’ companies to use their already lucrative profits on this much needed capacity growth…. The types of steel we use and need to obtain from willing international sources having nothing to do with national security concerns.”
In its letter to the Committee on Ways and Means, Priefert appealed for a change in the review process, which now allows unsubstantiated objections by domestic steel producers to stymie an application for relief. “Please consider the process by which these exclusion requests and reviews are conducted. The current forum has been used against Priefert, serving to attack our integrity and character without fear of reprisal or legal actions against those who would slander us. Priefert welcomes the Department of Commerce to substantiate our rebuttal with its own investigation.”

Tim Triplett
Read more from Tim TriplettLatest in Trade Cases

Price on Trade: IEEPA tariffs head to the Supreme Court, DOJ ramps up trade enforcement
International trade law and policy remain a hot topic in Washington and beyond this week. We are paying special attention to the ongoing litigation of the president’s tariff policies and the administration’s efforts to heighten trade enforcement.

Mexico considers stiff tariffs for steel, autos, and other imports
Mexico is considering imposing steep tariffs on imports of steel, automobiles, and over 1,400 other products. Its target? Countries with which it does not have free trade agreements, mainly China, India, Thailand, and other South Asian nations.

Leibowitz: With ‘reciprocal’ tariffs struck down again in court, what happens next?
President Trump’s “reciprocal” tariffs under the International Emergency Economic Policy Act (IEEPA) were struck down again, this time on Aug. 29 by the Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit (CAFC). The legal and policy mess continues, with the next stop being the US Supreme Court.

Market unfazed by US circuit court’s IEEPA decision
Repealing any reciprocal tariffs placed by President Donald Trump on US imports of direct reduced iron (DRI), iron ore, hot-briquetted iron (HBI), and pig iron would have only a nominal impact on the US steel market, market participants said.

ITC votes to keep HR duties after sunset review
The US government determined this week that hot-rolled steel imports from a handful of countries continue to threaten the domestic steel industry.