Trade Cases
Senators Call for Review of Tariff Exclusion Process
Written by Tim Triplett
November 27, 2018
In response to widespread concerns about the pace, transparency and fairness of the Section 232 steel and aluminum tariff exclusion process, a bipartisan group of senators has requested that the Government Accountability Office conduct an independent review of the Commerce Department’s performance.
In a Nov. 26 letter to the GAO, U.S. Senators Doug Jones (D-Ala.), Pat Toomey (R-Pa.), and Tom Carper (D-Del.) called for the review. Commerce had received 49,301 exclusion petitions and had issued decisions for just 16,567 (34 percent) of them as of the end of October. In their letter, the senators called for GAO to investigate key questions about the current process, including the criteria used to approve or deny an exclusion petition, how to improve the pace of the process and the cost to taxpayers.
“The Commerce Department exclusion process for the Trump administration’s tariffs on steel and aluminum has generated a large backlog of petitions and has placed significant burdens on American businesses,” the senators wrote. “As a result of the Section 232 actions, U.S. trading partners have levied retaliatory tariffs on billions of dollars of American exports. In addition, several countries, including U.S. allies like Canada, Mexico and the European Union (EU), have filed disputes against the United States using the World Trade Organization (WTO) dispute mechanism.”
The Trump administration maintains that duties of 25 percent on steel imports and 10 percent on aluminum imports are needed to protect domestic metals production, which is essential for national security, from unfair foreign competition. The tariffs took effect in March on imports from most countries and in June on Mexico, Canada and the EU. Congress could use the findings of the GAO report to push for changes to the exclusion process next year.
Tim Triplett
Read more from Tim TriplettLatest in Trade Cases
Price on Trade: IEEPA tariffs head to the Supreme Court, DOJ ramps up trade enforcement
International trade law and policy remain a hot topic in Washington and beyond this week. We are paying special attention to the ongoing litigation of the president’s tariff policies and the administration’s efforts to heighten trade enforcement.
Mexico considers stiff tariffs for steel, autos, and other imports
Mexico is considering imposing steep tariffs on imports of steel, automobiles, and over 1,400 other products. Its target? Countries with which it does not have free trade agreements, mainly China, India, Thailand, and other South Asian nations.
Leibowitz: With ‘reciprocal’ tariffs struck down again in court, what happens next?
President Trump’s “reciprocal” tariffs under the International Emergency Economic Policy Act (IEEPA) were struck down again, this time on Aug. 29 by the Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit (CAFC). The legal and policy mess continues, with the next stop being the US Supreme Court.
Market unfazed by US circuit court’s IEEPA decision
Repealing any reciprocal tariffs placed by President Donald Trump on US imports of direct reduced iron (DRI), iron ore, hot-briquetted iron (HBI), and pig iron would have only a nominal impact on the US steel market, market participants said.
ITC votes to keep HR duties after sunset review
The US government determined this week that hot-rolled steel imports from a handful of countries continue to threaten the domestic steel industry.