Trade Cases
AISI Stands Behind Tariffs as Court Begins Deliberations
Written by Tim Triplett
December 20, 2018
On Wednesday in New York, a three-judge panel on the U.S. Court of International Trade began deliberating a case that will examine the constitutionality of the Section 232 tariffs imposed by President Trump on imports of steel and aluminum in the name of national security. Opponents argue that such tariffs should be subject to congressional review and that the constitution prohibits Congress from delegating its legislative powers to the president.
For the American Iron and Steel Institute, which is a strong supporter of the Trump tariffs, the proper outcome of the case is clear. “We continue to strongly believe this case is without merit and the effort by importers of foreign steel to undermine the Section 232 relief through this case is bound to fail,” said AISI President and CEO Thomas J. Gibson. “Congress acted within its constitutional authority when it authorized the president to take action to adjust imports, when the Secretary of Commerce has determined that such imports threaten to impair the national security.”
AISI, in conjunction with the Steel Manufacturers Association, in September submitted an amicus brief in the lawsuit. The AISI-SMA submission contends “there is binding Supreme Court precedent (Federal Energy Administration v. Algonquin SNG) which establishes that Congress acted within its constitutional authority when it authorized the president to take action to adjust imports, based on the Secretary of Commerce’s determination. The statute sets forth an intelligible principle for the president to follow in carrying out the policy set by Congress.”
The outcome of the case could affect the administration’s plans to extend the tariffs to other imports, such as automobiles and auto parts, which it argues also threaten national security by eroding the nation’s industrial base.
Tim Triplett
Read more from Tim TriplettLatest in Trade Cases
Leibowitz: When the shutdown should end
There is no doubt that the current government shutdown reflects the vast divisions between the extremes of American politics, society, and even geography. Almost all Americans agree that government is necessary, but voters disagree...
Price: The U.S. Steel shutdown that wasn’t and a call to stop ‘valuation cheating’
How can the U.S. government block U.S. Steel’s Granite City rolling mill closure without harming other American steelmakers? Reducing imports should be the first step. Foreign producers continue to aggressively target the U.S. market, especially now as they find themselves displaced by Chinese exports.
US steel industry applauds ITC final determination in coated trade case
Domestic mills praised the US International Trade Commission’s (ITC's) final determination that imports of corrosion-resistant (CORE) steel from 10 countries pose a threat to them.
ITC’s final ruling: Dumped, subsidized CORE imports are harming domestic market
The US International Trade Commission (ITC) finds that corrosion resistant steel (CORE) imports from 10 countries have caused material damage to domestic product producers, according to the ITC’s statement.
Leibowitz: Trump’s tariffs confront a weakening market
Signs of weakness are already appearing in the tariff wall. The economy has slowed to the point that the Federal Reserve cut interest rates by 0.25%, or 25 basis points, last week. The cut came even as the rate of inflation continues to hover well above the Fed’s 2% target rate.