Trade Cases

Mexico Renews Non-Treaty Tariffs on Steel, Calls for End to Section 232
Written by Sandy Williams
March 4, 2019
Mexico’s Ministry of Economy announced last week that it will renew tariffs of 15 percent on imports of steel from countries that it does not have a free trade agreement with. The tariff does not impact steel imports from the U.S. or Canada.
The Ministry also stated that before signing a new North American trade agreement with the United States, the Section 232 measures would have to be removed.
“Mexico is a steel deficit country and, in particular, with the United States we have a deficit of more than two billion dollars. Steel trade between Mexico and the United States favors, no doubt, the American nation,” said Undersecretary of Industry and Commerce Ernesto Acevedo Fernández.
“We believe that before the ratification of the Treaty, Mexico must be excluded from the 232,” said Fernández.
“It is also well known that steel, the steel industry, is experiencing a moment when there is an excess of production capacity worldwide. This excess capacity is inexorably translated into a production that exceeds the global demand for steel.”
In addition to excess capacity, two other factors are challenging the steel environment, said Fernández.
“One, is that the administration of President Trump in the United States has considered that steel can have a negative impact and put at risk the national security of that country. And another additional element is that, derived from this and other factors between the United States and China, there is clearly a commercial war.”
Fernández was asked why Mexico does not increase its steel tariff to 25 percent to match the U.S. Section 232 measures. Care was taken, he said, to select retaliatory targets that did not have a significant inflationary effect or have repercussions on downstream users of steel and aluminum.
Section 232 tariffs pose “a major threat to the U.S.-Mexico relationship” said Fernández.
“We think that Mexico: 1) is deficient in steel and is deficient in aluminum with the United States; 2) We are business partners, and our economies are chained by different industrial processes.”
“In this context, the Mexican economy, in no sense, can constitute a threat to the national security of the United States.”

Sandy Williams
Read more from Sandy WilliamsLatest in Trade Cases

Price on Trade: IEEPA tariffs head to the Supreme Court, DOJ ramps up trade enforcement
International trade law and policy remain a hot topic in Washington and beyond this week. We are paying special attention to the ongoing litigation of the president’s tariff policies and the administration’s efforts to heighten trade enforcement.

Mexico considers stiff tariffs for steel, autos, and other imports
Mexico is considering imposing steep tariffs on imports of steel, automobiles, and over 1,400 other products. Its target? Countries with which it does not have free trade agreements, mainly China, India, Thailand, and other South Asian nations.

Leibowitz: With ‘reciprocal’ tariffs struck down again in court, what happens next?
President Trump’s “reciprocal” tariffs under the International Emergency Economic Policy Act (IEEPA) were struck down again, this time on Aug. 29 by the Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit (CAFC). The legal and policy mess continues, with the next stop being the US Supreme Court.

Market unfazed by US circuit court’s IEEPA decision
Repealing any reciprocal tariffs placed by President Donald Trump on US imports of direct reduced iron (DRI), iron ore, hot-briquetted iron (HBI), and pig iron would have only a nominal impact on the US steel market, market participants said.

ITC votes to keep HR duties after sunset review
The US government determined this week that hot-rolled steel imports from a handful of countries continue to threaten the domestic steel industry.