Trade Cases

Trump Postpones Automotive Tariffs for Six Months
Written by Tim Triplett
May 14, 2019
Opponents of the proposed Section 232 tariffs on imports of autos and auto parts have won at least a temporary reprieve. On Friday, President Trump announced that he will wait six months before reconsidering the tariffs to give the U.S. Trade Representative time to negotiate new agreements on automotive trade with Europe and Japan.
In a report delivered to the president on Feb. 17, the Department of Commerce concluded that imports of automobiles and certain auto parts represent a threat to the domestic auto industry and thus threaten to impair U.S. national security. Commerce reached the same conclusion regarding imports of steel and aluminum. The president had a statutory deadline of May 18 to respond to the Commerce Department’s automotive report.
“United States defense and military superiority depend on the competitiveness of our automobile industry and the research and development that industry generates,” read a statement from the White House on Friday. “The negotiation process will be led by USTR Robert Lighthizer and, if agreements are not reached within 180 days, the president will determine whether and what further action needs to be taken.”
Section 232 tariffs on automotive imports have faced widespread opposition, even from the domestic auto industry, which fears they will disrupt the industry’s complex global supply chains. The Center for Automotive Research has calculated that raising tariffs on vehicle imports would increase new car prices by thousands of dollars and reduce new car sales by more than a million units per year.
“The case remains clear – cars are not a national security threat,” said the Alliance of Automobile Manufacturers in a statement on Wednesday, just prior to the president’s announcement. “We are deeply concerned that the administration continues to consider imposing auto tariffs. By boosting car prices across the board and driving up car repair and maintenance costs, tariffs are essentially a massive tax on consumers. The higher prices would lower consumer demand and could lead to the loss of as many as 700,000 American jobs….
“Since 2017, domestic and international automakers are investing $22.8 billion in new and existing facilities in the United States—largely spurred by this administration’s pro-growth policies,” the Alliance continued. “However, increased auto tariffs threaten to undo this economic progress. At the end of the day, you can have tariffs or investment, but you can’t have both.”
The White House has not commented on the size of the automotive tariffs it may impose later this year, but the Section 232 tariffs on steel amounted to 25 percent and aluminum 10 percent.

Tim Triplett
Read more from Tim TriplettLatest in Trade Cases

Price on Trade: IEEPA tariffs head to the Supreme Court, DOJ ramps up trade enforcement
International trade law and policy remain a hot topic in Washington and beyond this week. We are paying special attention to the ongoing litigation of the president’s tariff policies and the administration’s efforts to heighten trade enforcement.

Mexico considers stiff tariffs for steel, autos, and other imports
Mexico is considering imposing steep tariffs on imports of steel, automobiles, and over 1,400 other products. Its target? Countries with which it does not have free trade agreements, mainly China, India, Thailand, and other South Asian nations.

Leibowitz: With ‘reciprocal’ tariffs struck down again in court, what happens next?
President Trump’s “reciprocal” tariffs under the International Emergency Economic Policy Act (IEEPA) were struck down again, this time on Aug. 29 by the Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit (CAFC). The legal and policy mess continues, with the next stop being the US Supreme Court.

Market unfazed by US circuit court’s IEEPA decision
Repealing any reciprocal tariffs placed by President Donald Trump on US imports of direct reduced iron (DRI), iron ore, hot-briquetted iron (HBI), and pig iron would have only a nominal impact on the US steel market, market participants said.

ITC votes to keep HR duties after sunset review
The US government determined this week that hot-rolled steel imports from a handful of countries continue to threaten the domestic steel industry.