Final Thoughts
Final Thoughts – USS & Big River Steel – My Opinion
Written by John Packard
September 30, 2019
U.S. Steel did what many analysts thought was impossible – they announced they are acquiring a 49.9 percent interest in Big River Steel. I wrote about this last week as a possibility and mentioned some of the reasons at that time why this deal might happen.
According to Big River Steel’s announcement, the $700 million cash price paid by U.S. Steel assumes a $2.325 billion enterprise value for the company. This is a far cry from the $3.0+ billion that was rumored to have been floated by Nucor, SDI and others about a year ago.
The initial comments I am getting from steel buyers show that most believe the move is a good one for U.S. Steel.
From my personal perspective and opinion, this was something U.S. Steel needed to be doing (getting into the EAF business) for a long time now. Big River Steel is brand new, state of the art and has done an excellent job of entering the flat rolled market. Of course, market conditions are constantly changing and the addition of the SDI plant in Texas (along with their plant in Mississippi and Nucor’s plants in Arkansas) should make for an interesting market for steel buyers in the coming months/years.
U.S. Steel will add a tremendous amount of value in research and development to BRS on automotive steel grades.
This deal opens the market for USS into Mexico. It also could be a facility from which to service USS/Posco if need be (hot rolled coils).
With Big River Steel, look for U.S. Steel to scrutinize their other assets and potentially make changes. The most vulnerable mill, at least geographically, would be their Granite City operation. Many steel buyers, as well as analysts and consultants, have suggested to me Granite City might be shuttered. This sounds logical. If that were to happen there would be a reduction in steel production of around 3.8 million tons.
I have also heard from my sources within the industry that Great Lakes may also be at risk. Combined, those two plants are rated to produce 6.6 million net tons of steel. Big River Steel will be able to produce approximately 3.3 million tons once their expansion is complete (next year).
Some are suggesting that the investment in Mon Valley may go away. After listening to Ryan Smith’s report at the 2019 SMU Steel Summit Conference, I am not so sure. If the technology works, Smith said it could be a game changer for U.S. Steel. I do not look at a company’s finances, so I will leave this one to the analysts to figure out.
I have read some of what the analysts have been reporting to their clients and the understanding is U.S. Steel’s core assets going forward will be its Gary Works, Mon Valley and Big River Steel. This leaves Great Lakes and Granite City exposed.
With the investment by USS being less than 50 percent, the initial market reaction is the BRS commercial team will remain intact for the time being. This could also mean that any changes at USS regarding other assets could take some time.
There is also discussion amongst steel buyers about the way steel is sold out of BRS. Big River does do indexed contract deals and they have a large spot market as well. Steel buyers hope the BRS sales team remains intact. U.S. Steel announced awhile back that they would not do indexed-based deals for 2020 contracts. Although I have spoken to some U.S. Steel customers who advise me there may be some flexibility for certain customers.
Something to consider – I was speaking to a couple of analysts about Big River Steel and the company is investing a large amount of money into being able to produce electrical steels. This is a product that USS does not make. Information as to how much of an investment has been made on the electrical steel project has been limited. One analyst expressed concern about the small size of the electrical steel market. Something to watch.
One thing is for sure, the market just got more interesting.
Stay tuned.
As always, your business is truly appreciated by all of us here at Steel Market Update.
John Packard, President & CEO
John Packard
Read more from John PackardLatest in Final Thoughts
Final Thoughts
Steel equities and steel futures fell hard after news broke earlier this week that the US and Mexico might reach an agreement that would result in the 50% Section 232 tariff coming off Mexican steel. The sharp declines didn’t make much sense, especially if, as some reports indicate, Mexico might agree to a fixed quota. They didn't make sense even if steel flows between the US and Mexico remain unchanged.
Final Thoughts
Even before the news about Mexico, I didn’t want to overstate the magnitude of the change in momentum. As far as we could tell, there hadn’t been a frenzy of new ordering following President Trump’s announcement of 50% Section 232 tariffs. But higher tariffs had unquestionably raised prices for imports, which typically provide the floor for domestic pricing. We’d heard, for example, that prices below $800 per short ton for hot-rolled (HR) coil were gone from the domestic market – even for larger buyers.
Final Thoughts
I want to draw your attention to SMU’s monthly scrap market survey. It’s a premium feature that complements our long-running steel market survey. We’ve been running our scrap survey since late January. And over just that short time, it’s become a valuable way not only for us to assess where scrap prices might go but also to quantify some of the “fuzzy” indicators - like sentiment and flows - that help to put the price in context.
Final Thoughts
I think there is an obvious case for sheet and plate prices going higher from here. That’s because, on a very basic level, the floor for flat-rolled steel prices, which is typically provided by imports, is now significantly higher than it was a week ago.
Final Thoughts
We're about to hit 50% Section 232 steel tariffs. What could happen?